2,359
edits
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Empirical study == | == Empirical study == | ||
The earliest looks studies | The earliest looks studies done in 1997, concluded that feminine faced males were more attractive than masculine faced males.<ref>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/pretty-boys-outscore-men-with-a-strong-jaw-1174300.html</ref> However [[Scientific Blackpill|numerous studies]] done since then have shown hyper masculinity is far more attractive and far more correlated with sexual success.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill</ref> | ||
The original looks studies were officially debunked about 10 years after the original studies were published, the new studies basically state that women are unattracted to males with only feminine traits and no masculine, but are fine with men looking feminine/androgynous as long as said men also have at least some hyper masculine features.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44642253_Are_Attractive_Men's_Faces_Masculine_or_Feminine_The_Importance_of_Controlling_Confounds_in_Face_Stimuli</ref> | The original looks studies were officially debunked about 10 years after the original studies were published, the new studies basically state that women are unattracted to males with only feminine traits and no masculine, but are fine with men looking feminine/androgynous as long as said men also have at least some hyper masculine features.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44642253_Are_Attractive_Men's_Faces_Masculine_or_Feminine_The_Importance_of_Controlling_Confounds_in_Face_Stimuli</ref> |