Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Women are coy and hypergamous
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
These findings suggest, as women are surpassing men in socioeconomic status, more men are becoming sexually unattractive. | These findings suggest, as women are surpassing men in socioeconomic status, more men are becoming sexually unattractive. | ||
''' | '''Female fickleness''' | ||
Since women are constantly anxious about not having the best man available, they get bored with relationships and sex sooner,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_rapidly_lose_interest_in_sex_once_in_a_stable_relationship_or_living_with_a_man</ref> | Since women are constantly anxious about not having the best man available, they get bored with relationships and sex sooner,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_rapidly_lose_interest_in_sex_once_in_a_stable_relationship_or_living_with_a_man</ref> | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
and have been in the US at least since year 1862.<ref>http://www.web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_gender_of_breakup.pdf</ref> | and have been in the US at least since year 1862.<ref>http://www.web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_gender_of_breakup.pdf</ref> | ||
''' | '''Female hypergamy explained by evolutionary psychology''' | ||
In terms of evolutionary psychology, hypergamy and women's choosiness can be explained by sex differences in parental investment ([[Bateman's principle]]), which in turn results in sex differences in sex drive. | In terms of evolutionary psychology, hypergamy and women's choosiness can be explained by sex differences in parental investment ([[Bateman's principle]]), which in turn results in sex differences in sex drive. | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
For this reason, the population of male incels [[Demographics|tends to be larger]] than female incels, and femcels are likely more often [[volcel|volcels]]. | For this reason, the population of male incels [[Demographics|tends to be larger]] than female incels, and femcels are likely more often [[volcel|volcels]]. | ||
''' | '''Female hypergamy explained by sexual economics''' | ||
In terms of economics, one can also regard sexual relationships as a deal and study them with market principles. | In terms of economics, one can also regard sexual relationships as a deal and study them with market principles. | ||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and are thought to have fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref> | and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and are thought to have fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref> | ||
''' | '''Female hypergamy has intensified''' | ||
There is evidence that hypergamy has intensified in the recent years. The top 5-20% of men (i.e. "[[Chad|Chads]]") are now having more sex than before the sexual revolution.<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref> | There is evidence that hypergamy has intensified in the recent years. The top 5-20% of men (i.e. "[[Chad|Chads]]") are now having more sex than before the sexual revolution.<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref> | ||