Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Overview
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The blackpill holds that | The blackpill holds that modernity and technology have unleashed [[foid|female sexuality]] and created a shallow, [[lookism|lookist]] and [[hypergamy|hypergamous]] dating sphere which is destroying the social fabric of civilization and that only reverting women's emancipation can help. | ||
Many blackpillers are convinced blackpill knowledge will spark a sexual revolution. | |||
The growth in popularity of the blackpill comes from the failure of the [[mainstream media]] and society of [[bluepill|bluepilled]] pontification, to account for otherwise inexplicable phenomena such as the [[halo effect]], [[hybristophilia]], [[cacophobia]] and how female choosiness is leads to [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]]. The central aspects of the blackpill are not new to academia at all, in fact, they often draw from scientific literature that predates the prevalent gynocentric monoculture in the social sciences such (e.g. [[Briffault's law]], [[Bateman's principle]] and [[sexy sons hypothesis]]). | The growth in popularity of the blackpill comes from the failure of the [[mainstream media]] and society of [[bluepill|bluepilled]] pontification, to account for otherwise inexplicable phenomena such as the [[halo effect]], [[hybristophilia]], [[cacophobia]] and how female choosiness is leads to [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]]. The central aspects of the blackpill are not new to academia at all, in fact, they often draw from scientific literature that predates the prevalent gynocentric monoculture in the social sciences such (e.g. [[Briffault's law]], [[Bateman's principle]] and [[sexy sons hypothesis]]). | ||