6,480
edits
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* High IQ behavior being unattractive | * High IQ behavior being unattractive | ||
* Prevalence of [[feminism]] shaming male academics to be impotent [[nice guy|nice guys]] | * Prevalence of [[feminism]] shaming male academics to be impotent [[nice guy|nice guys]] | ||
* Educated [[foid|foids]] being reluctant to date less educated men unless | * Educated [[foid|foids]] being reluctant to date less educated men unless they earn substantially more (see [[hypergamy]]) | ||
* Environmentalism making academic men less attractive to women as they are not as | * Environmentalism making academic men less attractive to women as they are not as materialistic. Also serving to generate overall pessimism | ||
* Harder fields of study may have higher incel rates as they are more time consuming | * Harder fields of study may have higher incel rates as they are more time consuming | ||
* Professional specialization generally favors slow [[life history]] speed | * Professional specialization generally favors slow [[life history]] speed | ||
* Status signaling among upper class might distinguish/polarize itself from activities in lower classes where people produce many offspring for ecological reasons, hoping one child will make it (favoring fast LH) which may be seen as | * Status signaling among upper class might distinguish/polarize itself from activities in lower classes where people produce many offspring for ecological reasons, hoping one child will make it (favoring fast LH) which may be seen as uncouth behavior in higher class circles | ||
* Harder fields of study are also less normative, more evolutionary novel, which might have an alienating effect [[mismatch hypothesis]], reducing social and hence sexual success | * Harder fields of study are also less normative, more evolutionary novel, which might have an alienating effect [[mismatch hypothesis]], reducing social and hence sexual success | ||
edits