2,359
edits
Mentalcel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=="Normal" mentalcels== | =="Normal" mentalcels== | ||
Although the term | Although the term mentalcel seems to imply a neurological disorder, preventing a romantic relationship, the scope of mentalceldom also includes totally normal men. Several studies have found that psychopathic men are more attractive to women than non-psychopathic men <ref>https://www.local10.com/health/study-claims-psychopathic-traits-of-men-more-attractive-to-women</ref> This brings the topic of mentalceldom into a grey area. Whom is actually crazy? Is the normal guy whose normalness renders him boring to women crazy? Or is the psychopathic male harmful to society, but nonetheless endearing to women crazy? Yes, the normal guy who's normalness is boring is crazy but [[bluepill|society]] would have us believe otherwise. Psychopathic traits have flourished in society because those biological traits have proven to result in higher fertility. | ||
Even women who adamantly claim that they oppose psychopathic traits, actually find psychopaths a turn-on and will freely admit to referring a man whom is very assertive. The man should be leading the romantic interactions and liaisons. This demand for assertiveness would have been a reasonable demand in the 1930s, and earlier when most of the cards were in the man's hands. But are these demands still reasonable in the 21st century when many of those cards are in the woman's hands? Women match or outmatch men at adulting in several ways they didn't in the past; for example they leave the home earlier, they're more likely to have a university degree, they are also more likely to have first-hand grown up with an adult parent of the same sex. All these factors and more means power has shifted into the hands of women. But are women aware that the cards are in their hands? If so, should women be expected to take more initiative? | Even women who adamantly claim that they oppose psychopathic traits, actually find psychopaths a turn-on and will freely admit to referring a man whom is very assertive. The man should be leading the romantic interactions and liaisons. This demand for assertiveness would have been a reasonable demand in the 1930s, and earlier when most of the cards were in the man's hands. But are these demands still reasonable in the 21st century when many of those cards are in the woman's hands? Women match or outmatch men at adulting in several ways they didn't in the past; for example they leave the home earlier, they're more likely to have a university degree, they are also more likely to have first-hand grown up with an adult parent of the same sex. All these factors and more means power has shifted into the hands of women. But are women aware that the cards are in their hands? If so, should women be expected to take more initiative? | ||