Mentalcel: Difference between revisions

Although the term mentalcels usually implies that one has some neurological condition that prevents one from forming a romantic relationship, the scope of mentalcels can also be broadened to include otherwise totally normal men. Several studies have found that psychopathic men are more attractive to women than non-psychopathic men.<ref>https://www.local10.com/health/study-claims-psychopathic-traits-of-men-more-attractive-to-women</ref> This brings the topic of mentalceldom into a grey area. Who is actually crazy? Is the normal guy whose normalness renders him boring to women and as such confines him to a lifetime of inceldom? Or the psychopathic traits which are obnoxious, harmful to society, but nonetheless seem endearing to women? Yes the normal guy who's normalness is boring is crazy but [[bluepill|society]] would have us believe otherwise. It is off course that psychopathic traits have flourished or even metastasized in society because those biological traits have proven to be a useful courting trait. perhaps natural selection guided by women ensures that such enter and forever remain within the human gene pool.

Even women who adamantly claim that they oppose psychopathic traits, find psychopaths a turn-off etc. will freely admit that they prefer a man who is very assertive. The man should be leading the romantic interactions and liaisons. This demand for assertiveness would have been a reasonable demand in the 1930s, and earlier when most of the cards were in the man's hands. But are these demands still reasonable in the 21st century when many of those cards are in the woman's hands? Women match or outmatch men at adulting in several ways they didn't in the past; for example they leave the home earlier, they're more likely to have a university degree, they are also more likely to have first-hand grown up with an adult parent of the same sex. All these factors and more means power has shifted into the hands of women. But are women aware that the cards are in their hands? If so, should women be expected to take more initiative?

How often do you hear women say, you're not sufficiently badwy, funny, entertaining, or perilous? But is it really necessary for a man to have these qualities? Why can't a man simply be normal, or bland? Especially when considering that women are often not required to have tose traits. This situation has blurred the line between what constitutes a mentalcel and doesn't. You could have straight A's at school, be neurotypical, but because you're slightly less assertive than the other guy who was beta orbiting her, she cancels you for consideration. So in a nutshell, if the modern dating scene remains static and doesn't change its ways, we're heading towards a future where something as simple as being unassertive relegates you into the mentalcel camp. Or in laymen's terms, being mentally normal, renders you mentally defective.