Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Dominant vs submissive
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Men incapable of competing for women are likely rendered incels. | Men incapable of competing for women are likely rendered incels. | ||
Further, men are chronically horny because of [[libido|women's lower sex drive]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men. It has also been observed that peripheralized men (incels) can establish social ties with horny men of higher social standing by homosociality and re-gain access to resources, and thus increase chances of [[reproductive success]].<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | Further, men are chronically horny because of [[libido|women's lower sex drive]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men. It has also been observed that peripheralized men (incels) can establish social ties with horny men of higher social standing by homosociality and re-gain access to resources, and thus increase chances of [[reproductive success]].<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | ||
Therefore, receptive/submissive gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition to impress women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260515593546</ref> | Therefore, receptive/submissive gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition to impress women and intimidate other men. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260515593546</ref> | ||
Below are historical examples of the prevalence of the dichotomy of dominant vs submissive homosexuality: | Below are historical examples of the prevalence of the dichotomy of dominant vs submissive homosexuality: | ||