Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Adverse effects of inceldom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Benefits of belongingness
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
The extend to which sexual exclusion and frustration causes social exclusion seems to be unknown currently, but some research results suggest sexual status is quite important for men, e.g. women prefer men who have sex<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_are_more_attracted_to_men_who_are_already_in_relationships_than_single_men</ref> and sex may raise men's peer status.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status</ref> | The extend to which sexual exclusion and frustration causes social exclusion seems to be unknown currently, but some research results suggest sexual status is quite important for men, e.g. women prefer men who have sex<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_are_more_attracted_to_men_who_are_already_in_relationships_than_single_men</ref> and sex may raise men's peer status.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status</ref> | ||
Clearer results exist for the adverse effects of social exclusion. A survey study by [[Roy Baumeister]] concluded belongingness is a fundamental need.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497</ref> | Clearer results exist for the adverse effects of social exclusion. A survey study by [[Roy Baumeister]] concluded belongingness is a fundamental need.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497</ref> | ||
Baumeister concludes quality is more important that quantity. "Having two | Baumeister concludes quality is more important that quantity. "Having two as opposed to no close relationships may make a world of difference to the person's health and happiness; having eight as opposed to six may have very little consequence. Also more that two hours of socializing per day appears to have diminishing returns.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656618300369</ref> | ||
Individuals with a melancholic disposition with close friends were indistinguishable from the controls without such disposition in terms of momentarily reported negative effect, social motivation and appraisal,<ref>https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5726948/figure/F3/</ref> suggesting social status among friends and/or socializing protect from depression. | Individuals with a melancholic disposition with close friends were indistinguishable from the controls without such disposition in terms of momentarily reported negative effect, social motivation and appraisal,<ref>https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5726948/figure/F3/</ref> suggesting social status among friends and/or socializing protect from depression. | ||