Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Generate TOC and links [bot])
Line 1,680: Line 1,680:
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Living_with_a_step-parent_is_the_greatest_single_risk_factor_for_child_abuse|permalink]] | [[#tocMonogamy|category: Monogamy]] | [[#tocLiving_with_a_step-parent_is_the_greatest_single_risk_factor_for_child_abuse|table of contents]]</div>
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Living_with_a_step-parent_is_the_greatest_single_risk_factor_for_child_abuse|permalink]] | [[#tocMonogamy|category: Monogamy]] | [[#tocLiving_with_a_step-parent_is_the_greatest_single_risk_factor_for_child_abuse|table of contents]]</div>


Daly & Wilson (1988) presented an examination of the causes of child homicide through the lense of evolutionary psychology in their book ''Homicide''.
Daly & Wilson (1988) presented an examination of the causes of child homicide through the lens of evolutionary psychology in their book ''Homicide''.


They found that an American child living with one or more substitute parents in 1976 was 100 times more likely to be killed than a child living with its natural birth parents. (Bachrach, 1983).
They found that an American child living with one or more substitute parents in 1976 was 100 times more likely to be killed than a child living with its natural birth parents (Bachrach, 1983).


Similar trends were also discovered in Canada (Burch, 1985) with a child living with a stepparent having a 70 fold increase in risk of being killed if it lived with a step-parent.
Similar trends were also discovered in Canada (Burch, 1985) with a child living with a stepparent having a 70 fold increase in risk of being killed if it lived with a step-parent.
Line 1,699: Line 1,699:
The authors stated that the 'social roles' hypothesis was inadequate in the case of child abuse committed by stepparents. The social role hypothesis states that stepparenthood is a stressful 'role' unclearly defined by societal norms, and that the stress caused by the nebulous nature of the role and the parent's consequence uncertainty is what leads to the greater incidence of abuse in such relationships.  
The authors stated that the 'social roles' hypothesis was inadequate in the case of child abuse committed by stepparents. The social role hypothesis states that stepparenthood is a stressful 'role' unclearly defined by societal norms, and that the stress caused by the nebulous nature of the role and the parent's consequence uncertainty is what leads to the greater incidence of abuse in such relationships.  


They regard parental investment theory as a better explanation of the phenomena. It is not the 'role' that makes the stepparent uneasy, but the underlying conflict caused by the fact theat they are expected to invest heavily in offspring that aren't their own and that they therefore do not see as worthy of such investment.
They regard parental investment theory as a better explanation of the phenomena. It is not the 'role' that makes the stepparent uneasy, but the underlying conflict caused by the fact that they are expected to invest heavily in offspring that aren't their own and that they therefore do not see as worthy of such investment.


Investing resources in such children may be seen as evolutionarily maladaptive, as they are competitiors for scarce resources with any children of their own that are produced by the relationship. It also creates tension because one is seen as sacrificing their own fitness interests in the favor of their partner, which is not generally seen in cases of adoption. It is common in the animal kingdom for a newly established dominant male to kill the young offspring produced by the defeated male, most notably seen in polygynous animals such as lions and gorillas.
Investing resources in such children may be seen as evolutionarily maladaptive, as they are competitors for scarce resources with any children of their own that are produced by the relationship. It also creates tension because one is seen as sacrificing their own fitness interests in the favor of their partner, which is not generally seen in cases of adoption. It is common in the animal kingdom for a newly established dominant male to kill the young offspring produced by the defeated male, most notably seen in polygynous animals such as lions and gorillas.
Infanticide for this purpose has likely been common throughout human evolutionary history also.
Infanticide for this purpose has likely been common throughout human evolutionary history also.


Line 1,721: Line 1,721:
Daly MC, Daly M. 1988. ''Homicide: Foundations of Human Behavior.''  
Daly MC, Daly M. 1988. ''Homicide: Foundations of Human Behavior.''  
Daly MC, Wilson DJ. 2007. ''Is the "Cinderella Effect Controversial?''. Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. [[http://www.martindaly.ca/uploads/2/3/7/0/23707972/cinderella_effect_2008.pdf Book]]
Daly MC, Wilson DJ. 2007. ''Is the "Cinderella Effect Controversial?''. Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. [[http://www.martindaly.ca/uploads/2/3/7/0/23707972/cinderella_effect_2008.pdf Book]]
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Serial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women">Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Serial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women">Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women</span>===
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Serial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women|permalink]] | [[#tocMonogamy|category: Monogamy]] | [[#tocSerial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women|table of contents]]</div>
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Serial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women|permalink]] | [[#tocMonogamy|category: Monogamy]] | [[#tocSerial_monogamy_increases_reproductive_success_in_men_but_not_in_women|table of contents]]</div>

Navigation menu