Homosexuality: Difference between revisions

Access to sex with women is negotiated by dominance status among men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817304105</ref><ref>Kruger DJ, Fitzgerald CJ. 2011. ''Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men.'' Personality and Individual Differences. 50(3):365-9. [[https://www.academia.edu/14471033/Reproductive_strategies_and_relationship_preferences_associated_with_prestigious_and_dominant_men Abstract]]</ref><ref>Boone,  J.  L.  (1986).  Parental  investment  and  elite  family  structure  in  preindustrialstates: A case study of late medieval-early modern Portuguese genealogies. Amer-ican Anthropologist, 88, 859-878.</ref><ref>Boone,  J.  L.  (1988).  Parental  investment,  social  subordination,  and  population  processes among the 15th and 16th century Portuguese nobility. In L. Betzig, M. B.Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 201-219). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.</ref><ref>Buss,  D.  M.  (1989).  Sex  differences  in  human  mate  preferences:  Evolutionary  hy-potheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.</li></ul></ref><ref><ul><li>Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice andintrasexual  competition.  In  J.  H.  Barkow,  L.  Cosmides,  &  J.  Tooby  (Eds.),  Theadapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249-266).New York: Oxford University Press.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York:Basic Books.</ref><ref>Ellis,  B.  J.  (1992).  The  evolution  of  sexual  attraction:  Evaluative  mechanisms  inwomen.  In  J.  H.  Barkow,  L.  Cosmides,  &  J.  Tooby  (Eds.),  The  adapted  mind:Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). New York:Oxford University Press.</ref><ref>Hill, E. M., Nocks, E. S., & Gardner, L. (1987). Physical attractiveness: Manipula-tion by physique and status displays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 143-154.</ref><ref>Mealey, L. (1985). The relationship between social status and biological success: Acase  study  of  the  Mormon  religious  hierarchy.  Ethology  and  Sociobiology, 6,249-257.</ref><ref>Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#tocHypergamy</ref>