Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Demographics of inceldom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Celibacy rates as more a result of female choice than male choice
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
In a 1989 peer-reviewed study that took place at Florida State University, 75% of men accepted random-sex invitations from random real-life women, whereas 0% of women accepted such offers.<ref>https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf.</ref> This combats the notion that men have choice in casual sex matters when they are not high-status, due to 0% of women accepting random-sex no-strings offers in a setting high in casual sex. That men have no choice in casual sex matters also makes overall celibacy rates seem to be mostly a product of women's choices than mens. The Florida study also showed both genders accept dates at a similar rate. That more women accept dates rather than direct-sex invitations suggest they use dates as a vetting mechanism, whereas men less so. | In a 1989 peer-reviewed study that took place at Florida State University, 75% of men accepted random-sex invitations from random real-life women, whereas 0% of women accepted such offers.<ref>https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf.</ref> This combats the notion that men have choice in casual sex matters when they are not high-status, due to 0% of women accepting random-sex no-strings offers in a setting high in casual sex. That men have no choice in casual sex matters also makes overall celibacy rates seem to be mostly a product of women's choices than mens. The Florida study also showed both genders accept dates at a similar rate. That more women accept dates rather than direct-sex invitations suggest they use dates as a vetting mechanism, whereas men less so. | ||
There have been attempts to replicate this study | There have been attempts to replicate this study in practice or theory, however all appear to have been non-naturalistic studies, unlike Hatfield and Clark, making them ultimately not interesting. They also vary in conclusions. Some agree with Hatfield and Clark<ref>https://interpersona.psychopen.eu/article/view/121/html</ref>, while others are more dismissive based on a dislike of the fact that the sex was no-strings. | ||
===Sexual frustration is a majoritarian issue=== | ===Sexual frustration is a majoritarian issue=== | ||