Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Tappé 2013, Matticka 2010
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
==Tappé 2013, Matticka 2010== | ==Tappé 2013, Matticka 2010== | ||
: [https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men_like_61.9.25_of_female_profiles.2C_women_like_only_4.5.25_of_male_profiles . Overall, men liked or superliked 61.9% of their female profiles. On the other hand, women only liked 4.5% of the male profiles, a sex ratio that is fairly close to the sex ratio in agreement to unsolicited invitations to sex in non-online naturalistic settings (e.g. Clark & Hatfield 1989, Tappé 2013, Maticka-Tyndale 2010).] Tappé was not a naturalistic setting, and it had many different results. Also where in Matticka does it show that? I can't find the full text, but no summary mentions findings like Hatfield and Clark. | : "[https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men_like_61.9.25_of_female_profiles.2C_women_like_only_4.5.25_of_male_profiles . Overall, men liked or superliked 61.9% of their female profiles. On the other hand, women only liked 4.5% of the male profiles, a sex ratio that is fairly close to the sex ratio in agreement to unsolicited invitations to sex in non-online naturalistic settings (e.g. Clark & Hatfield 1989, Tappé 2013, Maticka-Tyndale 2010).]" Tappé was not a naturalistic setting, and it had many different results. Also where in Matticka does it show that? I can't find the full text, but no summary mentions findings like Hatfield and Clark. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC) | ||