Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Sources
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
::The OP might be referring to sections such as this:(https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpillaction=edit&veswitched=1&oldid=33723#Incel_forums_are_disproportionately_populated_by_suicidal.2C_disabled.2C_autistic.2C_and_ethnic_men) that rely on internet polls with a dubious methodology and lack of typical statistical sampling techniques etc. I agree this is the typical argument a hostile interlocutor responds with when presented with such a body of evidence, so this is an important point. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 12:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ::The OP might be referring to sections such as this:(https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpillaction=edit&veswitched=1&oldid=33723#Incel_forums_are_disproportionately_populated_by_suicidal.2C_disabled.2C_autistic.2C_and_ethnic_men) that rely on internet polls with a dubious methodology and lack of typical statistical sampling techniques etc. I agree this is the typical argument a hostile interlocutor responds with when presented with such a body of evidence, so this is an important point. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 12:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: I think readers with such standards will distrust an article that uses "Penis", "Sluts" "ItsOver" as subsection titles anyhow. There is a trade-off between entertainment and signaling high research standards. I think we're striking the balance well currently as the overwhelming majority of sources is reputable. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 14:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ::: I think readers with such standards will distrust an article that uses "Penis", "Sluts" "ItsOver" as subsection titles anyhow. There is a trade-off between entertainment and signaling high research standards. I think we're striking the balance well currently as the overwhelming majority of sources is reputable. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 14:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
:"As a suggestion, sources should absolutely be kept to prestigious and reputable journals, articles, studies, etc." Sounds like a good way to let the establishment serve as gatekeepers keeping out any evidence that would go against their dogma. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:C877:2538:C82D:5C7F|2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:C877:2538:C82D:5C7F]] 04:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== To do list == | == To do list == | ||