Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Fisherian runaway: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Proposal to revert: new section
(→Proposal to revert: new section) |
|||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Bib if blackpills are too harsh to swallow don't be a blackpiller | Bib if blackpills are too harsh to swallow don't be a blackpiller | ||
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC) | [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Proposal to revert == | |||
https://incels.wiki/w/index.php?title=Fisherian_runaway&oldid=37932 | |||
This is a version i edited before Mikey reverted it. It contains a more streamlined lede, slight reordering (especially regarding female choice) and restores several points that I think are correct, but that Mikey removed without awaiting consensus (full evidence is in the edit history). If Mikey disagrees with points in sexy sons, he has to refute things one-by-one in the talk page, especially as his version was not an obvious improvement (arguably it was worse and repeptitive). Mikey's new description of the mechanism was also faulty as far as I can tell, so I restored the original one and improved it. So, let's revert to this version and then merge proposed chances one by one. We can shorten and streamline things as we continue. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 00:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC) | |||