Demographics of inceldom: Difference between revisions

Some [[feminist|feminists]] have claimed the comparison in acceptance to invitations to sex is not fair because women need to know the men first to be safe. However, there is solid evidence that women do engage in very adventurous sex with no hope for reciprocity or investment on part of the man, if the man has [[statusmaxxing|status]]<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939</ref> and/or is exceptionally good looking ([[sexy sons hypothesis]]). Van Halen had ''sex tents''<ref>https://www.cracked.com/article_22900_van-halens-sex-hut-8-acts-legendary-rockstar-debauchery.html</ref> set up at his performances. This proves women do engage sometimes in adventurous, unsafe sex, therefore most [[femcel|femlcels]] are believed to be [[volcel|volcels]]. Feminists have a point in that women have more [[Bateman's principle|parental investment]], but phenomena like sex tents and sexy sons suggest women exploit their choosiness somewhat, so their inceldom seems more self-inflicted.

With inceldom near tripling in a decade and steady partnerships almost cut in half for those between 18-35, as shown above, we can see that inceldom issues are approaching a majoritarian issue.  With 51% of young adults without a partner, we can safely conclude that the amount of people sympathetic to incels due to their own situation may now be a majority of young adults.