2,359
edits
Talk:Coolness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 01:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 01:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Finished Page as far as text goes more videos welcome! == | |||
In response to Bib "Women can engage in cool behavior and be dangerous from an objective standpoint, such as a female combat soldier in the United States Army, however their faces hardly advertise danger at all. So women and men that resemble women, cannot be universally considered cool." | |||
also added | |||
Dangerous activities like free climbing, sex, binge drinking, going to war, etc. are cool because they are dangerous. One could argue purposefully setting one's hand on fire is dangerous but not cool. The counter argument to that is any dangerous behavior no matter how stupid, can be cool if played off with stoicism and finesse. | |||
For example, one sets their own hand on fire, and without flinching, calmly blows the flames out in an impressive manner hardly seeming to try at all, and then one brushes their hair back, with that same hand, and says "Ain't got time to burn." The stupid act of setting one's own hand on fire has just been made cool. | |||
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 02:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||