Talk:Coolness: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
909 bytes added ,  15 November 2019
moved bib's comment to the discussion section
(Created page with "== Females actually can be cool, same with animals == The requirements to be cool are as follows Coolness is dominance signaling by looking *fashionable* and *dangerous*, as...")
 
(moved bib's comment to the discussion section)
Line 16: Line 16:


[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
== Can women be cool at all dispute ==
Bibipi's comment:
See also the subreddit /r/UNBGBBIIVCHIDCTIICBG.
There is dispute about whether women can be cool at all. Oftentimes, women lack the danger and dominant facial features to be perceived as cool. Moreover, coolness is dominance signaling by competence and women do this much less. Women rather compete by looks and reputation. Also men do not care about women's dominance status, which does not mean they dislike dominant women, but they do not prefer either dominant or non-dominant women.
Women do often display a withdrawn, but confident calmness though. It has been suggested that because women play it easy like this, people misperceive women as socially apt, when in truth they only almost never fail with embarrassment because they rarely leave their comfort zone.
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 01:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Navigation menu