2,359
edits
Charisma: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This communication style makes them bearable in any area were status is determined by rank and competence, instead of likability, such as in the military, but they struggle with friendships, and maintaining useful connections and relationships. [[looks|Beautiful people]] are often forgiven if they happen to have an ugly speech pattern, due to [[Halo effect|halo effect.]] | This communication style makes them bearable in any area were status is determined by rank and competence, instead of likability, such as in the military, but they struggle with friendships, and maintaining useful connections and relationships. [[looks|Beautiful people]] are often forgiven if they happen to have an ugly speech pattern, due to [[Halo effect|halo effect.]] | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
The best way to adapt a beautiful speech pattern is simply remove the personal pronouns I, you, he, she, it, me, him, her, and replace them with nicknames such as bud, a person, bro, man, sweetheart, etc. Or leave them out entirely. | The best way to adapt a beautiful speech pattern is simply remove the personal pronouns I, you, he, she, it, me, him, her, and replace them with nicknames such as bud, a person, bro, man, sweetheart, etc. Or leave them out entirely. | ||
For example instead of "Are ''you'' going to the grocery store today?" Use " When will the groceries be bought?" This puts focus on the groceries which is the intent of the conversation and doesn't insinuate in any way that the other person was ''supposed'' to get the groceries, which can cause conflict. A beautiful speech pattern is not necessarily feminine, nor is it neurotypical. Instead it is descriptive, narrative, and storyteller like. | For example instead of "Are ''you'' going to the grocery store today?" Use " When will the groceries be bought?" This puts focus on the groceries which is the intent of the conversation and doesn't insinuate in any way that the other person was ''supposed'' to get the groceries, which can cause conflict. A beautiful speech pattern is not necessarily feminine, nor is it neurotypical. Instead it is descriptive, narrative, and storyteller like. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 54: | ||
== [[Melvin|Autistic virgin]] speech pattern pickup == | == [[Melvin|Autistic virgin]] speech pattern pickup == | ||
{{Quote|"Will those long chocolate legs buckle while I'm bending you over? No? Ok. Well I'l try again later. But now I want to taste you. I want to hear you moan, and you know how much I love hearing you moan. Yes, I'll keep trying to bend you over. I think I can get you to do it. I can see that your ass is really fat and i love that about you. Don't fight it, you know you want me to. You can feel my hard cock pushing against your ass right now! I know it feels good, just let me fuck! Your pushing me away? What are you doing that for?"|Mikey Blayze}} | {{Quote|"Will those long chocolate legs buckle while I'm bending you over? No? Ok. Well I'l try again later. But now I want to taste you. I want to hear you moan, and you know how much I love hearing you moan. Yes, I'll keep trying to bend you over. I think I can get you to do it. I can see that your ass is really fat and i love that about you. Don't fight it, you know you want me to. You can feel my hard cock pushing against your ass right now! I know it feels good, just let me fuck! Your pushing me away? What are you doing that for?"|Mikey Blayze}} | ||
== Evolutionn == | |||
The [[beauty]] of speech and thought has possibly evolved because as useful competence for "social survival" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_human_intelligence#Social_brain_hypothesis social brain hypothesis of intelligence]), and/or [[beauty|aesthetic sexual selection]] and related [[Fisherian runaway|feedback loops]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_human_intelligence#Sexual_selection sexual selection hypothesis of intelligence]). Arguably, people can cooperate and negotiate well without poise and elegance though, lending sexual/aesthetical selection some credibility. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||