Hypergamy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
891 bytes removed ,  12 November 2019
Line 20: Line 20:
<!--Due to women's dependence on men, women naturally want resource security in relationships much more than men.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X</ref>-->In terms of sexual economic theory (SET), women sexually ''commodify themselves'' with a certain exchange value whenever they sexually reject or accept men based on the male's ability to secure a wide variety of resources.  In practice this is how women select men, as women evolved to associate sex more with provisioning children than did men.
<!--Due to women's dependence on men, women naturally want resource security in relationships much more than men.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X</ref>-->In terms of sexual economic theory (SET), women sexually ''commodify themselves'' with a certain exchange value whenever they sexually reject or accept men based on the male's ability to secure a wide variety of resources.  In practice this is how women select men, as women evolved to associate sex more with provisioning children than did men.
Sex then becomes a resource that men can ''purchase'' by amassing a broad array of valued goods, including non-monetary resources such as fame and competence.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref>
Sex then becomes a resource that men can ''purchase'' by amassing a broad array of valued goods, including non-monetary resources such as fame and competence.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref>
This causes human females to compete with each other to inflate the "price" of sex, increasing men's sexual frustration, thus increasing the value of sex and baiting men into engaging in more committed resource provision.  Women are also believed slut-shame one another maintain the value of sex, as sex given away for free lowers the value of sex, which reduces women's leverage over men.<ref>Baumeister & Twenge, 2002</ref> In this manner, women collude, forming [[pussy cartel|pussy cartels]], and inciting one another's hypergamy.
This causes human females to compete with each other to inflate the "price" of sex, increasing men's sexual frustration, thus increasing the value of sex and baiting men into engaging in more committed resource provision.  Women are also believed slut-shame one another maintain the value of sex, as sex given away for free lowers the value of sex, which reduces women's leverage over men.<ref>Baumeister & Twenge, 2002</ref> In this manner, women collude, forming [[pussy cartel|pussy cartels]], and inciting one another's hypergamy. By having men work for them, women become a leisure class.
<!-- NOTE: the part below is not clear. why is "men competing" a premise for the cost of sex to rise? the last bit about "commodify as much as possible" also seems repetitive
Male intrasexual competition rather takes the form of amassing resources.  When men compete in terms of resources and women raise the resource cost of sex, this creates a situation where the men with the most resources get the most sexual access.
In other words, women pair "up" in resource status among men.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref>  Women are the 'sellers' in the [[sexual marketplace]], thus they choose '''whenever they want to have sex''' by merely accepting a buyer or lowering their price.  Whereas men must engage in the work necessary to amass the resources required to buy what women collectively commodify if women refuse to submit to [[Sexual Marxism]] or give sex away for free and without discrimination. -->


====Bodyguard hypothesis====
====Bodyguard hypothesis====
25,837

edits

Navigation menu