Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | ||
All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men (cf. [[homocel hypothesis]]). It has also been observed that peripheralized men (incels) can establish social ties with horny men of higher social standing this way, re-gaining their access to resources and potentially restoring some amount of [[reproductive success]].<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men (cf. [[homocel hypothesis]]).<ref>Ristroph, Alice. "Prison, Detention, and Correctional Institutions." Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender. Ed. Fedwa Malti-Douglas. Vol. 3. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. 1196-1199. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 7 Oct. 2016.</ref> It has also been observed that peripheralized men (incels) can establish social ties with horny men of higher social standing this way, re-gaining their access to resources and potentially restoring some amount of [[reproductive success]].<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | ||
Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. Receiving gay sex (being the "bottom" rather than the "top") is also widely regarded as submissive and feminine, i.e. weak.<ref>Schippers M. 2007. ''Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony.'' Theory and Society. Vol. 36.1, pp. 85–102. [[http://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="NYC">Wegesin DJ, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 2000. ''Top/Bottom Self-Label, Anal Sex Practices, HIV Risk and Gender Role Identity in Gay Men in New York City.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03 Abstract]] Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Vol 12.3, pp. 43–62.</ref><ref>Hoppe T. 2011. ''Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men's bottom narratives'' Sexualities. Vol. 14.2, pp. 193–217. [[http://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033 Abstract]]</ref> | Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. Receiving gay sex (being the "bottom" rather than the "top") is also widely regarded as submissive and feminine, i.e. weak.<ref>Schippers M. 2007. ''Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony.'' Theory and Society. Vol. 36.1, pp. 85–102. [[http://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="NYC">Wegesin DJ, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 2000. ''Top/Bottom Self-Label, Anal Sex Practices, HIV Risk and Gender Role Identity in Gay Men in New York City.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03 Abstract]] Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Vol 12.3, pp. 43–62.</ref><ref>Hoppe T. 2011. ''Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men's bottom narratives'' Sexualities. Vol. 14.2, pp. 193–217. [[http://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033 Abstract]]</ref> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Homosexual penetration of another man is probably the ultimate act of domination. | Homosexual penetration of another man is probably the ultimate act of domination. | ||
It is, for example used to emasculate rivals in prison (in addition to satisfaction of sexual frustration). Honor-shame cultures also frequently employ sodomy for this purpose, as is e.g. reported in the Christian Bible (Genesis 19).<ref>http://honorshame.com/inhospitality-as-sodomy/</ref> A more concrete historical example would be the gang rape of Lawrence of Arabia by his Ottoman Turkish captors.<ref>https://spartacus-educational.com/IRQlawrence.htm</ref> | It is, for example used to emasculate rivals in prison (in addition to satisfaction of sexual frustration).<ref>Hensley, Christopher; Tewksbury, Richard (2002). "Inmate-to-Inmate Prison Sexuality : A Review of Empirical Studies". Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 3 (3): 226–243. doi:10.1177/15248380020033005</ref> Honor-shame cultures also frequently employ sodomy for this purpose, as is e.g. reported in the Christian Bible (Genesis 19).<ref>http://honorshame.com/inhospitality-as-sodomy/</ref> A more concrete historical example would be the gang rape of Lawrence of Arabia by his Ottoman Turkish captors.<ref>https://spartacus-educational.com/IRQlawrence.htm</ref> | ||
== Homophobia == | == Homophobia == | ||