Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Sources: new section
(→‎Sources: new section)
Line 40: Line 40:
:::This is an example response to a response to a response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
:::This is an example response to a response to a response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
::This is another example response to the first response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
::This is another example response to the first response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
== Sources ==
As a suggestion, sources should absolutely be kept to prestigious and reputable journals, articles, studies, etc.
Non-reputable sources, even if it´s just one for a particular item, work as cherrypicking arguments for ignorant people. I suggest if there are any like these they be pushed to the supplemental part.
159

edits

Navigation menu