159
edits
(→Sources: new section) |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::This is an example response to a response to a response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | :::This is an example response to a response to a response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
::This is another example response to the first response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | ::This is another example response to the first response [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Sources == | |||
As a suggestion, sources should absolutely be kept to prestigious and reputable journals, articles, studies, etc. | |||
Non-reputable sources, even if it´s just one for a particular item, work as cherrypicking arguments for ignorant people. I suggest if there are any like these they be pushed to the supplemental part. |
edits