Hypergamy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hypergamy (edit)

Revision as of 00:26, 5 November 2019

7,807 bytes added ,  5 November 2019
Undo revision 33306 by William (talk)
No edit summary
(Undo revision 33306 by William (talk))
Tag: Undo
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:kkklll.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]
[[File:kkklll.jpg|500x500px|right|<center></center>‎]]
'''Hypergamy''' is the natural inclination for women to "[[branchswinging|trade up]]" in terms of [[LMS|looks, money, and/or status]]. In a social environment which seeks to [[neoliberalism|free human sexuality from cultural influence]], women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally [[sexual selector]]s. Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, more than men, to the point of causing increasingly rampant [[inceldom]] among the male population.
In the scientific literature, the term '''hypergamy''' mostly refers to '''marrying up''' in socioeconomic status. Hypergamy is more commonly observed in women, but it can refer to either men or women. It is a central aspect of the [[blackpill]].


Modern women are always calculating whether the gains from a new [[relationship]] will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. [[Femoid|Femoids]] are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. Women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to [[Marriage#Move Toward Polyamory with Rise in Divorce|jump ship when ready]].
In the [[manosphere]], the term hypergamy is used more broadly for marrying or dating up in any regard, for example in physical attractiveness, and it can refer to dating up relative to a woman's previous partner or relative to other males available, not just herself or the social standing of her family.<ref>https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Male-Rollo-Tomassi/dp/1492777862</ref> Women appear to [[pussy cartel|incite one another's hypergamy]].


In biology, "[[Bateman's Principle]]", outlines the results of female hypergamy, even among non-human animals. Opposition or aversion to hypergamy is sometimes called [[666phobia]].
Women's hypergamy is mainly a result of their higher [[Sexual selector|choosiness]], [[variability hypothesis|higher uniformity of sexual desire]], and men's [[Libido|higher sex drive]] and promiscuity. Men have fewer alternative mating options available to them, so they more readily make compromises and date down.<ref>https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf</ref> Women's preference for high status men ties into the natural [[Dominance hierarchies|hierarchical social organization]] found in humans.


== 80/20 Rule ==
== Academic Overview ==
[[File:413.jpg|thumb|left|<center>okcupid deleting their internal dating studies shortly after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack</center>‎]]
<!--[[File:Needgf.jpg|thumb|right]]-->
[[File:okcupid.png|thumb|right|<center>Women rate 80% of men as below the average of all men, source: Okcupid</center>‎]]
An internal OkCupid study revealed that the vast majority of women only consider about 20% of men to be average in looks, and irrationally evaluate 80% of men brave enough to show their mug on a public website '''as below the average of all men'''.<ref>http://archive.is/489UV</ref> In the most popular [[dating]] app Tinder, a mating analyst found out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men".<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>  Because women are [[sexual gatekeeper]]s their preferences decide the [[dating]] scene.
[[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]


OkCupid deleted its internal studies showing how women view 80% of men as below average after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack, but many archives exist including the ones cited above.
<br><br>
===Disclaimer===
Some retards who read this page to write in an academic journal about the incel attitude towards hypergamy (like [[Rebecca Karlén]]) think incorrectly that incels mean that 20% of the men '''get''' 80% of the women.  Firstly, with the 80/20 rule, we are talking about trends in '''access''' and '''attention''' in mating instead of trying to describe 100 percent of the end '''results''' of mating.  Although, we think the trends in access and attention in mating have a downstream effect on the results of mating.  Many women and men don't end up partnering despite their dating pool. Secondly, we mean that the 80/20 rule has only been proven to be applicable to *online dating* apps given the evidence cited above, but the fact that [[dating#Online dating is now the primary way people meet for relationships|all dating is moving online]] means that this is becoming more true [[IRL]] as well.


== Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy ==
===Women commodify sex===
[[File:486.png|400x400px|right|<center></center>‎]]
Researchers suggest that relationships are naturally more likely to occur the more broad array of resources a man has compared to the woman.<ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref>
This is due to the fact that men desire initiating sex with the average person of the opposite gender much more than women.  This gives women almost all the power in sexual matters, part of what is broadly referred to as the, "principle of least interest".  The person with the least interest in initiating something chooses when and on what terms that activity will occur.<ref>Waller & Hill, 1951</ref>  As women are the sexual selectors, when they sexually reject men they are sexually commodifying '''themselves''' with a certain exchange value relative to who and how many men they reject.  Sex, in the absence of [[Sexual Marxism|Sexual Marxism/Fascism]] then becomes a, "'''female''' commodified resource for social exchange", in which a, "broad range of valued goods", are competed for by men in order to, ''purchase'' sex from women with this broad array of (often non-monetary) resources.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref>  Females compete with each other to, "sell high", in the form of withholding sex,<ref>Baumeister & Twenge, 2002</ref> slut-shaming, and gossip.  Whereas male sexual competition takes the form of amassing the "broad range of valued goods".  When men compete in terms of resources and women raise the resource cost of sex, this creates a situation where the men with the most resources get the most sexual access.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref>  Women, being the sellers of the sexual access they collectively commodify as much as possible,can choose '''whenever they want to have sex''' by merely accepting a buyer or lowering their price.  Whereas men must engage in the work necessary to amass the resources required to buy what women collectively commodify if women refuse to submit to [[Sexual Marxism]] or give sex away for free and without discrimination.
[[File:poorcel2.png|thumb|250px|right|If you are over 25 and poor, women want you to die in a fire, source OkCupid.<ref>http://archive.is/rBE2U</ref>]]


A common [[normie]] counterargument to [[:Category:Aesthetics|lookist theory]] would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as on apps and that you can display a bit of [[personality]] when approaching a woman, thus overriding hypergamy. Other studies, however, stress on the notion called the “[[halo effect]],” in which your perceived [[personality]] could be in correlation to how you look<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/92158/TheHaloEffect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>.
===Women want all poor men to die in a fire painfully===
For example, men are commonly told to be funny to attract women. In reality, it is not the case that being funny makes you more attractive. Instead, being attractive makes you appear more funny<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny</ref> and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations<ref>https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040</ref>.  
[[File:Womens orgasms based on male wealth.PNG|thumb|200px|left]]
Higher income of the man was found to be associated with female orgasm and lower income predicted sexlessness.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513808001177</ref><ref>https://cnnespanol2.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/polletandnettle-orgasms.pdf?attredirects=1</ref>
Women's promotion also increased the risk of divorce.<ref>http://www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp1146.pdf</ref><ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0968-7</ref>
However another study did not find effects for marriage satisfaction and likelihood of women's divorce initiation.<ref>https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_gender_of_breakup.pdf</ref>
Aversion to having the wife earn more than the husband did, however, explain 29% of the decline in marriage rates over the last thirty years.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv001</ref>
Also women's attractiveness ratings are 1,000 times more sensitive to men's income than vice-versa,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008</ref>
and women also rate men with high status cues (e.g. presentation of luxury goods) as more sexually attractive, while men don't care about this.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.1</ref>
Women have a higher likelihood of experiencing orgasms during sex the wealthier the man.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513808001177</ref><ref>https://cnnespanol2.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/polletandnettle-orgasms.pdf?attredirects=1</ref>
Men's social status also accounts for 62% of the variance of frequency of copulation opportunities.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939</ref>
Mixed results in existing relationships and marriages suggest that relationships have mostly already passed the hypergamous filter, i.e. already mostly fulfill the condition for the man being the most valuable man available which also may not only be decided by the measures of power differential used in the studies (income and education status), but rather by physical dominance, physical attractiveness, peer popularity and occupational prestige. Power differentials in marriages are seen as unfavorable in Western culture which may negatively affect such marriages.


Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman even to desire you intimately. There has to be a physical attraction at first for a [[relationship]] to be initiated. While women say that [[personality]] matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first and foremost<ref>https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOHdZKDldIg</ref>.
== Intensified hypergamy and male sexlessness==
[[File:Aaqa.jpg|thumb|400px|right|The rise of the sexless affects men more than women]]
More evidence of increased hypergamy is the raise of inceldom, which affects both sexes, but men more than women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Demographics_of_inceldom#Growth_in_Numbers</ref>
The share of men under 30 who aren't having sex has possibly tripled in the past decade according to the Washington Post using data from the General Social Survey.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/?utm_term=.9b52429c7136</ref>


As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free results in sexual inequality since only a few men would be desired by women. The other 80% have to [[LMS|make up heavily with status or money]].
More evidence is that the top 5-20% of men are having more sex than ever before. The data from the 2002 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health can demonstrate this.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#The_top_5-20.25_of_men_.28ie._.22Chads.22.29_are_now_having_more_sex_than_ever_before</ref><ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013
Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554
</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref><ref>https://incels.co/threads/science-confirms-compared-to-last-decade-women-putting-out-only-for-chad.42066/</ref>
The researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners.  
Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (i.e., "Chads"). Thus Chads are truly having more sex than ever before. Below are direct quotes from the study:


* ''Although we found no change in median numbers of sex partners [for men], we found significant increases in the numbers of sex partners reported by the top 5% and 20%.''
* ''We found an overall statistically significant increase in reported lifetime opposite-sex sex partners overall for men in the top 20% from 12 in 2002 to 15 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 11–14 and 15–15, respectively).''
* ''Similarly, there was a statistically significant overall increase in reported lifetime partners for men in the top 5% from 38 in 2002 to 50 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 30–40 and 50–50, respectively).''


== GINI coefficients ==
[[File:266.png|thumb|600x600px|left]]
===College educated women===
There are indications that hypergamy and inceldom is partially born from college educated women and the like.
Technology and liberalism have allowed more women to enter the workforce and surpass men in educational and socioeconomic status, hence rendering more men unattractive to women due to women's hypergamous preference to date up.
This has possibly resulted in an increase in male [[inceldom]], but also female singlehood, in fact high status women are often observed to prefer singlehood over dating down.<ref>https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26747</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#Women_lose_mating_opportunities_with_higher_status.2C_men_gain_mating_opportunities</ref><ref>https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv001</ref><ref>https://fee.org/articles/why-single-women-are-way-more-likely-to-own-a-home-than-single-men/</ref><ref>https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-release/journal-marriage-and-family/do-unmarried-women-face-shortages-partners-us-marriage-mar</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12603</ref>


A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human [[relationship]]s found that “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women”<ref>https://contexts.org/blog/who-has-how-many-sexual-partners/</ref>.  Famous sexologist [[Kristin Spitznogle]] says this is proof that [[Bateman's Principle]] now applies to humans.<ref>https://resett.no/2018/06/29/menn-i-ufrivillig-solibati/</ref>  A separate study of Tinder found that Tinder's GINI coefficient between the genders was on scale with the income inequality of third-world countries (see chart below).<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>
{{quote|Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new [[relationship]]s with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners.<ref>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf</ref>}}
[[File:tinder.jpg|thumb|left|<center></center>‎]]
<br>
A data scientist for Hinge reported on the Gini coefficients he had found in his company’s abundant data, treating “likes” as the equivalent of income. He reported that heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542.  While the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:<ref>https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/</ref>


"On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa."
===Online dating makes everything worse===
<br>
Sexually frustrated men and the abundance of them in online dating and social media, likely also intensify hypergamy: Frustrated men aim down more, which inflates women's self-esteem and gives them hope of securing a mate with exceptional high mate value, so they become even more choosy and date up more or show [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_fatigue decision fatigue] which creates even more sexually starved men, forming a feedback loop.<ref>https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601909/how-tinder-feedback-loop-forces-men-and-women-into-extreme-strategies/</ref>
Growing economic inequality and decreasing economic growth likely have the same effect as fewer men can attain reliable high status, which is what women go for.<ref>https://journals.openedition.org/chs/737</ref><ref>http://ftp.iza.org/dp4456.pdf</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_sexualize_themselves_online_to_attract_high_status_mates</ref>


== Increased Male Celibacy ==
==Marriages are falling apart because women want tingles from alphas==
However, intensified hypergamy likely cannot only be seen in rise of singlehood, but also in less stable relationships:
With a decline of marriage norms, greater acceptance of polygamy and [[divorce]] laws greatly benefit women, women more readily [[Marriage#Move Toward Polyamory with Rise in Divorce|jump ship]] when a better man is available, which can be seen in women initiating divorces more often than men and a closing gender gap in infidelity<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Blackpill#cite_note-46</ref>, despite the fact that men oppose their partner's infidelity much more strongly.<ref>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2196146/Why-affairs-unforgivable-Six-women-forgive-partner-strayed-twice.html</ref><ref>http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691617698225</ref>


The share of men under 30 who aren't having sex has nearly tripled in the past decade according to the Washington Post using data from the General Social Survey.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/?utm_term=.9b52429c7136</ref>
===Cock Carousel===
[[File:Aaqa.jpg|thumb|600x600px|center|<center></center>‎]]
The increase in single motherhood, and a higher rate of childless men,<ref>https://sciencenorway.no/childlessness-fathers-forskningno/a-quarter-of-norwegian-men-never-father-children/1401047</ref> likely also points to hypergamy as a minority of men engages in ''serial monogamy'' (i.e. remarries often) which is ''de facto polygamy''. Single motherhood may also come from riding the "[[cock carousel]]" too much. Young women chase the [[666 dating rule|666 rule]] and then turn bitter when they have to settle with an ugly [[betabux]], and so end up lonely with their kids. The fact that they've been "pumped and dumped" is evidence that these women have aimed excessively high and carelessness, i.e. high [[SMV]] men would have lost interest due to their plentiful other options. Women are known to turn bitter towards other men once rejected.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_bitterly_reject_unattractive_men_after_facing_rejection_themselves_by_an_attractive_man</ref>


<br>
Since looks are the main factor in leading to sexual attraction, we could assume that females are not appreciating the facial appearances of most men and not giving their sexual favors to them frequently.
<br><br>
== The Cock Carousel ==
The [[cock carousel]] is a phenomenon that is associated with hypergamy. In theory, women would chase as many [[Chad]]s as possible, chasing the [[666 dating rule|666 rule]], during their prime years before settling with a [[betabux]].
[[File:579.png|600x600px|center|<center></center>‎]]
[[File:579.png|600x600px|center|<center></center>‎]]


==Dual-mating strategy==
== 80/20 Rule ==
One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing [[long-term relationship|long-term]] , cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a [[strategic pluralism|dual-mating strategy]] in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring”<ref>http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf</ref>. The lack of loyalty with a dual-mating strategy begets the [[feminine imperative]].
[[File:413.jpg|thumb|left|<center>okcupid deleting their internal dating studies shortly after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack</center>‎]]
[[File:okcupid.png|thumb|right|<center>Women rate 80% of men as below the average of all men, source: Okcupid</center>‎]]
An internal OkCupid study revealed that the vast majority of women only consider about 20% of men to be average in looks, and irrationally evaluate 80% of men brave enough to show their mug on a public website '''as below the average of all men'''.<ref>http://archive.is/489UV</ref> In the most popular [[dating]] app Tinder, a mating analyst found out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men".<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>  Because women are [[sexual gatekeeper]]s their preferences decide the [[dating]] scene.
[[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]


Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) have tendencies to fuck the [[Chad]]s first, and once they become entirely used up and hit the wall, search for a [[betabux]] to attain financial security and raise children.
OkCupid deleted its internal studies showing how women view 80% of men as below average after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack, but many archives exist including the ones cited above.


==It's OVER if you're a male and not wealthy==
The 80/20 phenomenon is observable in other phenomena, otherwise known as the "Pareto Principle", however this "principle" is commonly taken way too literally. As the only meaningful insight of it is that extreme end points (eg best looking meen) account for most of the impact in that particular world (sexual market) in '''already''' unequally distributed patterns.  It is important to remember that Pareto was a lunatic who genuinely believed that his "laws" proved that social darwinism<ref>http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue80/Flomenhoft80.pdf</ref> was necessary to "eliminate" undesirables ("toxins")<ref>https://books.google.com/books?id=zg91TAIs6bgC&pg=PA155&lpg=PA155&dq=%22which+will+promptly+perish+if+prevented+from+eliminating+toxins%22&source=bl&ots=YmuWBObJGH&sig=ACfU3U2H_NqwX07WqcH7n-UTnQc74Pk_gw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiL0YLa2tHlAhVNmVkKHUjcBqYQ6AEwDnoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22which%20will%20promptly%20perish%20if%20prevented%20from%20eliminating%20toxins%22&f=false</ref>.  None of his "laws" have been proven as unchanging or necessary, but rather correlated with a large number already unequally distributed patterns.  In other words, the "80/20" rule describes inequality (in this case the distribution of affection in online dating), but it does not "prove" that things will always be severely unequally distributed.
[[File:Needgf.jpg|thumb|right]]
Women are 1000 times pickier on the issue of a potential partner's wealth than men according to an academic research study by Guanlin Wang.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X</ref>


If you are over 25 and are poor women want you to die in a fire, source OkCupid.<ref>http://archive.is/rBE2U</ref>
According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 56 percent of women and 59 percent of men have had sex by the time they finish high school.<ref>https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/2017_tables/sexual_behaviors.htm#t133_down</ref> If access to sexual intercourse in real life followed an "80/20 rule", then we would expect less people having sex by the time they left high school.  At the same time, the more people are online dating, and the real-life dating sphere will become more unequal over time as online dating becomes even more popular.  So the "80/20" rule is simply a warning of the damaging effects of our current dating scene, which is increasingly dominated by online dating.


[[File:poorcel2.png|thumb|center]]
== Inequality within sexes ==
<br>
[[File:tinder.jpg|thumb|400px|right|<center></center>‎]]
This is driven, perhaps biologically, as women orgasm quite a bit more around wealthy men.
[[File:Womens orgasms based on male wealth.PNG|500x500px|center]]
<br>


== It’s OVER if your female partner becomes more physically attractive ==
A study analyzing GINI coefficients in human [[relationship|relationships]] found that “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women”<ref>https://contexts.org/blog/who-has-how-many-sexual-partners/</ref>.  Famous sexologist [[Kristin Spitznogle]] says this is proof that [[Bateman's Principle]] now applies to humans.<ref>https://resett.no/2018/06/29/menn-i-ufrivillig-solibati/</ref>  A separate study of Tinder found that Tinder's GINI coefficient between the genders was on scale with the income inequality of third-world countries (see chart below).<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>
[[File:486.png|thumb|left|<center></center>‎]]
[[normie|Normalfaggots]] love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels since women at heart always want [[Chad]] and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance.  


“Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new [[relationship]]s with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners”<ref>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf</ref>.
A data scientist for Hinge reported on the Gini coefficients he had found in his company’s abundant data, treating “likes” as the equivalent of income. He reported that heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542.  While the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:


Another study showed that women orgasm more frequently when having sex with attractive guys than with non-attractive guys<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002</ref>. This shows that women are very likely to keep pursuing Chads for maximum sexual pleasure.
{{Quote
[[File:266.png|thumb|700x700px|right]]
|On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa.<ref>https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/</ref>}}


<div style="clear:left;"></div>
== Historical evidence ==


==The top 5-20% of men are having more sex than ever before ==
The famous English writer and socialist, George Orwell, poignantly wrote about male poverty and homelessness frequently being concomitant with inceldom, due to female hypergamy, in his famous novel about the underclass, Down and Out in Paris and London, in 1933:
Data was drawn from the 2002 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health.<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013
Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554
</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref>
<ref>https://incels.co/threads/science-confirms-compared-to-last-decade-women-putting-out-only-for-chad.42066/
</ref>


The researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners.  
{{Quote|It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above - even a very little above - are as far out of reach as the moon. The reasons are not worth discussing, but there is little doubt that women never, or hardly ever, condescend to men who are much poorer than themselves.
 
A tramp, therefore, is a celibate from the moment when he takes to the road. He is absolutely without hope of getting a wife, a mistress, or any kind of woman except — very rarely, when he can raise a few shillings — a prostitute.
Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (i.e., "Chads"). Thus Chads are truly having more sex than ever before.
It is obvious what the results of this must be: [[homosexuality]], for instance, and occasional rape cases. But deeper than these there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man’s self-respect.|George Orwell, Down and Out in Paris and London, 1933<ref>"Down and Out in Paris and London",1933, George Orwell, Chapter XXXVI.</ref>}}
 
'''Direct Quotes:'''
* ''Although we found no change in median numbers of sex partners [for men], we found significant increases in the numbers of sex partners reported by the top 5% and 20%.''
* ''We found an overall statistically significant increase in reported lifetime opposite-sex sex partners overall for men in the top 20% from 12 in 2002 to 15 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 11–14 and 15–15, respectively).''
* ''Similarly, there was a statistically significant overall increase in reported lifetime partners for men in the top 5% from 38 in 2002 to 50 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 30–40 and 50–50, respectively).''


==Woman Talking About Hypergamy Honestly==
== Women admitting hypergamy ==
<center><youtube>eB7qKbZWoWk</youtube></center>
<youtube>eB7qKbZWoWk</youtube>
<youtube>FrLequ6dUdM</youtube>


==Universities teach our shit==
== Hypergamy gallery ==
<br>
[[File:196.jpg|thumb|center]]
 
== References ==
<references />
 
== Hypergamy Gallery ==
 
<gallery perrow=7 caption="">


<gallery perrow="7" caption="">
File:Hypergamy4.png
File:Hypergamy4.png
File:Hypergamy6.png
File:Hypergamy6.png
File:Hypergamy7.png
File:Hypergamy7.png
File:196.jpg
File:486.png
File:266.png
</gallery>


</gallery>
== References ==
<references />


== See Also ==
== See Also ==
*[[Blackpill]]
*[[Hinge]]
*[[Hinge]]
*[[Juggernaut law]]
*[[Juggernaut law]]
*[[Wagecuck]]
*[[Wagecuck]]
*[[Hypogamy]]
*[[Hypogamy]]
*[[Anna Bey]]
*[[Sexual realism]]
*[[666 dating rule]]


[[category:Hypergamy]][[category:Theories]]
[[category:Hypergamy]]
 
[[category:Theories]]
==External Links==
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB7qKbZWoWk Woman talking about hypergamy honestly]
 
[https://yuki.la/fit/27413339 "Anon" fucks a landwhale]


{{A}}
{{A}}
William
Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837

edits

Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/33307"

Navigation menu