Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Jordan Peterson: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Peterson warns enforcing equality by a shaming culture (collectivism) is highly corruptible because it admits too much power to centralized institutions enforcing these rules, and creates adverse incentives. | Peterson warns enforcing equality by a shaming culture (collectivism) is highly corruptible because it admits too much power to centralized institutions enforcing these rules, and creates adverse incentives. | ||
He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]). | He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]). | ||
Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal | Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal. Hierarchies and social stratification yield a strong incentive for status ascension which furthers cooperation because ascension can for the most part, only occurs as compensation for ones cooperation. | ||
One should rather strive for ''equal opportunity'' than ''equal outcome''. | |||
Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism). | Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism). | ||
Equal opportunity, on the other hand, holds people responsible, gives people a sense of accomplishment and real status in proportion to their contributions (individualism). | Equal opportunity, on the other hand, holds people responsible, gives people a sense of accomplishment and real status in proportion to their contributions (individualism). | ||