Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Jordan Peterson: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Peterson warns enforcing equality by a shaming culture (collectivism) is highly corruptible because it admits too much power to centralized institutions enforcing these rules, and creates adverse incentives. | Peterson warns enforcing equality by a shaming culture (collectivism) is highly corruptible because it admits too much power to centralized institutions enforcing these rules, and creates adverse incentives. | ||
He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]). | He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]). | ||
Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal, especially since hierarchies/social stratification yield a strong incentive for status ascension and thus cooperation as people end up contributing | Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal, especially since hierarchies/social stratification yield a strong incentive for status ascension and thus cooperation as people end up contributing while ascending in status. | ||
Hence, one should rather strive for ''equal opportunity'' than ''equal outcome''. | Hence, one should rather strive for ''equal opportunity'' than ''equal outcome''. | ||
Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism). | Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism). | ||