Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
54 bytes added ,  31 October 2019
Line 240: Line 240:
Some propose ''sex communism'' and ''state-issued girlfriends'' as a solution to inceldom, however others have objected that such projects seems unlikely to succeed socially/politically, as they are well outside of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window Overton Window] in all liberal democracies, at least, and as such would likely require an authoritarian state that was invested in solving the problem to sucessfully implement, and it is also seen as doubtful whether healthy relationships can form when a relationship is not "earned", but assigned by fiat. Both men and women often want to be proud of their partner choice. For that, both men and women need to know where they stand.
Some propose ''sex communism'' and ''state-issued girlfriends'' as a solution to inceldom, however others have objected that such projects seems unlikely to succeed socially/politically, as they are well outside of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window Overton Window] in all liberal democracies, at least, and as such would likely require an authoritarian state that was invested in solving the problem to sucessfully implement, and it is also seen as doubtful whether healthy relationships can form when a relationship is not "earned", but assigned by fiat. Both men and women often want to be proud of their partner choice. For that, both men and women need to know where they stand.
</li><li>
</li><li>
[[Jordan Peterson]] proposes the solution lies primarily in ''enforcing monogamy'', but he opposes the complete abolition of women's emancipation. In his words, "the question is not if, but how". Peterson believes hierarchies are necessary for people to have certainty where they stand and which he sees are important for relationships to form. Peterson emphasizes responsibility, "growing up", as well as mental and physical posture, which many incels perceive as [[Chadsplaining]].
[[Jordan Peterson]] proposes the solution lies primarily in ''enforcing monogamy'', but he opposes the complete abolition of women's emancipation. In his words, "the question is not if, but how".<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnEFt20qe0o</ref> Peterson believes hierarchies are necessary for people to have certainty where they stand and which he sees are important for relationships to form. Peterson emphasizes responsibility, "growing up", as well as mental and physical posture, which many incels perceive as [[Chadsplaining]].
</li><li>
</li><li>
Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive).  
Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive).  
17,538

edits

Navigation menu