Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Social constructionism''' is a sociological philosophy that describes how humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each others actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of fixed social roles. The first social constructivist philosophers believed | '''Social constructionism''' is a sociological philosophy that describes how humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each others actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of fixed social roles. The first social constructivist philosophers believed liberalism created a nebulous form of social role adoption. And that social role adoption in the absence of traditional institutions creates reality itself. | ||
This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. These social roles all groups form then define those groups over time as well as the causes they claim to represent. | This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. These social roles all groups form then define those groups over time as well as the causes they claim to represent. | ||