Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Social constructionism''' is a sociological philosophy that describes how humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each others actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of fixed social roles. The first social constructivist philosophers believed the, “death of God”, created a nebulous form of social role adoption. And that social role adoption in the “absence of God” creates reality itself. | '''Social constructionism''' is a sociological philosophy that describes how humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each others actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of fixed social roles. The first social constructivist philosophers believed the, “death of God”, created a nebulous form of social role adoption. And that social role adoption in the “absence of God” creates reality itself. | ||
This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. These social roles all groups form then define those groups over time as well as the causes they claim to represent. | ||
The theory was formalized by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. ‘’’They did not have a prescriptive stance towards human behavior or modernity’’’, but were rather attempting to be descriptive. Furthermore, they did not make many claims about the validity of non-social causes of behavior. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | The theory was formalized by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. ‘’’They did not have a prescriptive stance towards human behavior or modernity’’’, but were rather attempting to be descriptive. Furthermore, they did not make many claims about the validity of non-social causes of behavior. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | ||