Hypergamy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Important for u to add this boyo. This is the true edit that needs to be added
(Important for u to add this boyo. This is the true edit that needs to be added) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hypergamy is the inclination for women to "trade up" is terms of looks, money, or status. | Hypergamy is the inclination for women to "trade up" is terms of looks, money, or status. | ||
Women are always calculating whether the gains from a new relationship will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. [[Femoids]] are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. While hypergamy has always existed, women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to jump shit when ready | Women are always calculating whether the gains from a new relationship will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. [[Femoids]] are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. While hypergamy has always existed, women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to jump shit when ready. | ||
== 80/20 Rule == | == 80/20 Rule == | ||
A analysis of online dating reveals than the vast majority of women who rate men only consider about 20% of them to be actually attractive in looks. In the most popular dating app of tinder, people have fsound out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men" [1] | A analysis of online dating reveals than the vast majority of women who rate men only consider about 20% of them to be actually attractive in looks. In the most popular dating app of tinder, people have fsound out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men" [1]. | ||
== Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy == | == Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy == | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== GINI coefficients == | == GINI coefficients == | ||
A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human relationships found that, “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women” | A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human relationships found that, “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women” [6]. | ||
Keep in mind that women commonly lie about the number of their partners to avoid appearing as sluts | Keep in mind that women commonly lie about the number of their partners to avoid appearing as sluts (only a view would actually say the truth. This gives the illusion that sexual inequality might exist among men. The only reason why the GINI coefficient isn’t close to .6 (80/20) among men is because sub8 males are more likely to exaggerate their number of partners to avoid being virgin shamed. | ||
== More and more males are becoming celibate == | |||
Here is a graph that shows that male celibacy is rising, while female celibacy is decreasing. | Here is a graph that shows that male celibacy is rising, while female celibacy is decreasing. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
The [[cock carousel]] is a phenomenon that is associated with hypergamy. In theory, women would chase as many [[Chads]] as possible during their prime years before settling with a betabux. | The [[cock carousel]] is a phenomenon that is associated with hypergamy. In theory, women would chase as many [[Chads]] as possible during their prime years before settling with a betabux. | ||
One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing long-term, cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a dual-mating strategy in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring” | One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing long-term, cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a dual-mating strategy in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring” [7]. | ||
Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) fuck the [[Chads]] first, and once they become completely used up and hit the wall, search for a [[betabux]] to attain financial security and actually raise children with. | Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) want to fuck the [[Chads]] first, and once they become completely used up and hit the wall, search for a [[betabux]] to attain financial security and actually raise children with. | ||
[[normie|Normalfaggots]] love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels, since women at heart always want Chad and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance. | [[normie|Normalfaggots]] love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels, since women at heart always want Chad and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance. | ||
“Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new relationships with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current | “Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new relationships with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners” [8]. | ||
Overall, the conclusion from this whole article should be: sub8’s are essentially screwed and can’t compete with Chad, thanks for natural and societal promoted female hypergamy: | Overall, the conclusion from this whole article should be: sub8’s are essentially screwed and can’t compete with Chad, thanks for natural and societal promoted female hypergamy: | ||