Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Women are coy and hypergamous
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Women's sexual market value is, on the other hand, rather determined by their looks and their reputation of chastity and faithfulness.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011</ref> | Women's sexual market value is, on the other hand, rather determined by their looks and their reputation of chastity and faithfulness.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011</ref> | ||
The economic dynamics in such kind of sexual market are believed to also give rise hypergamy,<ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref> | The economic dynamics in such kind of sexual market are believed to also give rise hypergamy,<ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref> | ||
and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref> | and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and are thought to have fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref> | ||
There is evidence that hypergamy has intensified in the recent years. Namely, the top 5-20% of men (i.e. "[[Chad|Chads]]") are now having more sex than before the sexual revolution.<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref> | There is evidence that hypergamy has intensified in the recent years. Namely, the top 5-20% of men (i.e. "[[Chad|Chads]]") are now having more sex than before the sexual revolution.<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554</ref><ref>https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref> | ||