Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Homosexuality''' is the sexual attraction to the same sex. | '''Homosexuality''' is the sexual attraction to the same sex. It is widely agreed upon that [[lesbian|lesbians]] are mostly hypocritical [[Misandrist|man-haters]], indoctrinated by [[feminism]].<ref> | ||
17% of U.S. women [https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/ identify as "strong feminists"]. | |||
1.5% or so of women [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States are lesbians (not bi)]. | |||
Further, "45% of self-identified feminists in a US sample identified as non-heterosexual, predominantly gynephilious (Liss and Erchull, 2010) as compared to 5.6% in a USA probability sample (Bogaert, 2000), which means that feminists were 4.5 times more likely to be non-exclusively heterosexual." ([https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full Source]) | |||
Hence, 17% * 45% = 7.7% of women are predicted to be lesbians. By this reasoning, it highly likely that nearly all of the 1.5% lesbians are very strong feminists. | |||
</ref> | |||
For this reason, this article will only cover male homosexuality, which is of high relevance for male inceldom. | |||
Only a minority of historical cultures have approved of or ignored homosexuality (around 20%).<ref>http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/Cross-Cultural_Codes.pdf</ref> | Only a minority of historical cultures have approved of or ignored homosexuality (around 20%).<ref>http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/Cross-Cultural_Codes.pdf</ref> | ||
== | == Receiving gay sex is associated with low status == | ||
Access to sex with women is negotiated by dominance status among men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817304105</ref> | Access to sex with women is negotiated by dominance status among men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817304105</ref><ref>Kruger DJ, Fitzgerald CJ. 2011. ''Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men.'' Personality and Individual Differences. 50(3):365-9. [[https://www.academia.edu/14471033/Reproductive_strategies_and_relationship_preferences_associated_with_prestigious_and_dominant_men Abstract]]</ref> | ||
Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | ||
All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[boypussy]] to other horny men ( | All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[boypussy]] to other horny men (cf. [[homocel hypothesis]]). | ||
Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. | Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. Receiving gay sex (the "bottom" rather than the "top") is also widely regarded as submissive and feminine, i.e. weak.<ref>Schippers M. 2007. ''Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony.'' Theory and Society. Vol. 36.1, pp. 85–102. [[http://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="NYC">Wegesin DJ, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 2000. ''Top/Bottom Self-Label, Anal Sex Practices, HIV Risk and Gender Role Identity in Gay Men in New York City.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03 Abstract]] Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Vol 12.3, pp. 43–62.</ref><ref>Hoppe T. 2011. ''Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men's bottom narratives'' Sexualities. Vol. 14.2, pp. 193–217. [[http://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033 Abstract]]</ref> | ||
== Penetrative gay sex as costly signal of high status == | == Penetrative gay sex as costly signal of high status == | ||