Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Dominance hierarchy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Criticism
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
== Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
[[File: | [[File:Erh.jpg|thumb|Do not take advice from this [[wagecuck]] about how humans work]] | ||
Hyper-liberal media and academia have challenged the notion of a human alpha male recently, saying animalistic concepts are applied to humans is pseudo-science.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0165025407084054</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ti86veZBjU</ref> | Hyper-liberal media and academia have challenged the notion of a human alpha male recently, saying animalistic concepts are applied to humans is pseudo-science.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0165025407084054</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ti86veZBjU</ref> | ||
However, there is nothing pseudo-scientific or conspiratorial about the fact that men differ in their social, romantic and material success. With differential ability and success, it is inevitable that someone will be the best one and there is a host of evidence that women choose the best man of the ones that convincingly show interest ([[hypergamy]]). What is special about humans is that they compete in a wide variety of ways and culture determines to which degree physical aggression as in animals is involved. | However, there is nothing pseudo-scientific or conspiratorial about the fact that men differ in their social, romantic and material success. With differential ability and success, it is inevitable that someone will be the best one and there is a host of evidence that women choose the best man of the ones that convincingly show interest ([[hypergamy]]). What is special about humans is that they compete in a wide variety of ways and culture determines to which degree physical aggression as in animals is involved. | ||