Incel: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
30 bytes added ,  13 October 2019
Line 23: Line 23:
Another study found that delayed sexual activity "creates health risks by impeding development of the emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal skills that are crucial to satisfactory sexual functioning and general well-being."<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/78bmza/the-cost-of-losing-your-virginity-late</ref>
Another study found that delayed sexual activity "creates health risks by impeding development of the emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal skills that are crucial to satisfactory sexual functioning and general well-being."<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/78bmza/the-cost-of-losing-your-virginity-late</ref>
Of course, the causality is not clear in most of these studies, meaning it is not clear whether isolation creates health problems or unhealthy people are more likely socially isolated. But some studies do show causal link.
Of course, the causality is not clear in most of these studies, meaning it is not clear whether isolation creates health problems or unhealthy people are more likely socially isolated. But some studies do show causal link.
The public is strongly in favor of incels remaining asexual beings, which is likely driven by latent [[eugenic]] or [[racism|racist]] concerns, but increasingly also by environmentalist concerns (overpopulation).
The public is strongly in favor of incels remaining asexual beings, which is likely driven by latent [[eugenics|eugenic]], [[racism|racist]] or [[lookist|lookism]] concerns, but increasingly also by environmentalist concerns (overpopulation).
The state has an interest to prevent people from reproducing who are unfit for raising children, yet it is amazingly ineffective at prohibiting those who are unfit from doing so, e.g. the most anti-social males have a disproportionately greater amount of children<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625439</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000774</ref> and sexual partners.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20120513221622/http://abacon.com/ellis/tables/ch8.pdf</ref>
The state has an interest to prevent people from reproducing who are unfit for raising children, yet it is amazingly ineffective at prohibiting those who are unfit from doing so, e.g. the most anti-social males have a disproportionately greater amount of children<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625439</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000774</ref> and sexual partners.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20120513221622/http://abacon.com/ellis/tables/ch8.pdf</ref>
At the same time peaceful and motivated men have no chance, likely because women's standards have been spoiled by feminism and dating apps, because men are not raised to assert dominance and because people marry late or not at all, giving way to polygamous and open relationships which only benefits the most attractive men due to female [[hypergamy]].
At the same time peaceful and motivated men have no chance, likely because women's standards have been spoiled by feminism and dating apps, because men are not raised to assert dominance and because people marry late or not at all, giving way to polygamous and open relationships which only benefits the most attractive men due to female [[hypergamy]].
17,538

edits

Navigation menu