6,472
edits
Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Reasoning
mNo edit summary |
m (→Reasoning) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
This is despite the the fact that the posession, distribution and production of such materials is illegal in many jurisdictions. | This is despite the the fact that the posession, distribution and production of such materials is illegal in many jurisdictions. | ||
Related to this, in an Italian study conducted in 2011 regarding the pornography viewing habits of young adults and the relationship between pornography use and sexual violence, it was discovered that 16.5 % of female students sampled reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21997464</ref> | Related to this, in an Italian study conducted in 2011 regarding the pornography viewing habits of young adults and the relationship between pornography use and sexual violence, it was discovered that 16.5 % of female students sampled reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21997464</ref> | ||
In addition, Miletski (2002) reported that 87 percent of males and 100 percent of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. <ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> | In addition, Miletski (2002) reported that 87 percent of males and 100 percent of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. <ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> | ||