Rape: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
72 bytes added ,  28 September 2019
m
Line 80: Line 80:


==Conception from rape==
==Conception from rape==
There exists some evidence <ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5918e1e478ea</ref> that women are more likely to conceive from rape intercourse then consensual intercourse. For obvious reasons, this is a very controversial subject to study (with Feminists employing the Naturalistic Fallacy to condemn such findings - i.e if rape is 'natural' then it must be good - ergo researchers into these matters are encouraging rape,) and the evidence for this assertion is mixed.
There exists some evidence <ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12110-003-1014-0</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5918e1e478ea</ref> that women are more likely to conceive from rape intercourse then consensual intercourse. For obvious reasons, this is a very controversial subject to study (with Feminists employing the Naturalistic Fallacy to condemn such findings - i.e if rape is 'natural' then it must be good - ergo researchers into these matters are encouraging rape,) and the evidence for this assertion is mixed.


Gottschall& Gottschall, using data from a national telephone survey of violence against women in the United States, found that there was a double (6.4% versus 3.1%) rate of conception from acts of rape vs consensual intercourse.
Gottschall& Gottschall, using data from a national telephone survey of violence against women in the United States, found that there was a double (6.4% versus 3.1%) rate of conception from acts of rape vs consensual intercourse.

Navigation menu