Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,329 bytes added ,  23 September 2019
Line 3,193: Line 3,193:
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* MacDonald G, Baratta PL, Tzalazidis R. 2015. ''Resisting Connection Following Social Exclusion: Rejection by an Attractive Suitor Provokes Derogation of an Unattractive Suitor.'' Social Psychological and Personality Science. 6(7): 766-772. [[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550615584196 Abstract]]
* MacDonald G, Baratta PL, Tzalazidis R. 2015. ''Resisting Connection Following Social Exclusion: Rejection by an Attractive Suitor Provokes Derogation of an Unattractive Suitor.'' Social Psychological and Personality Science. 6(7): 766-772. [[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550615584196 Abstract]]
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">A large survey study found no clues to stronger sexual motivation among women</span>===
----
Baumeister et al. (2001) conducted a comprehensive survey study of sex difference in sex drive and found not a single study that significantly showed women have a higher sex drive. Baumeister's and related results results are also summarized in the '''[[libido]]] article'''.
A higher male sex drive implies that women are the bottleneck in reproduction and that multiple males end up competing for any given male. This is aggravated by the fact that women have a shorter reproductive window, so there is a larger group of men competing for the few fertile women. As a consequence, men's love style is active and women's love style is passive and choosy. Since men have fewer mating options, they more likely make compromises and date down, explaining, in part, why hypergamy exists.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* Baumeister, R.F., Catanese, K.R. and Vohs, K.D., 2001. ''Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence.'' [[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5f84/46340d4ed375007351539e7993fa44e2e31b.pdf FullText]]


==''Cucks''==
==''Cucks''==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu