Blackpill: Difference between revisions

! Pill Theory

! [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus_of_control Locus of Control]

===1. Looks are necessary to the formation of physical or romantic desire ===

Women place a minimum threshold of physical attractiveness on potential mates.<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x</ref>  Women also lie about the degree of importance of physical attractiveness.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/58607-mens-looks-may-matter-more-than-personality.html</ref> The common objection is that personality would matter too. Sadly, looks were the only factor to predict romantic interest in speed dating.<ref>https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-11095-001</ref> Attractiveness and masculinity also predict a woman's chance of orgasm.<ref>https://putslab.la.psu.edu/documents/Puts%20et%20al.%20EHB%202012-1.pdf</ref> Looks are highly heritable as well.<ref>https://www2.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Mitchem%20et%20al%202013%20Estimating%20the%20sex-specific%20effects%20of%20genes%20on%20facial%20attractiveness%20and%20sexual%20dimorphism.pdf</ref> Looks play a central role both in long-term and short-term relationships for both sexes.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22468419</ref> Women are also seemingly more choosy about looks, e.g. they rate 80% of men as below [[Decile|5/10]] both in online dating and elsewhere.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_rate_80.25_of_men_as_.22below_average.22.2C_while_men_rate_women_on_a_bell_curve</ref> While not as drastic as their ratings suggest, there is indeed evidence of women dating up in looks, e.g. very unattractive men were less likely married in one study. Conversely, very unattractive women were more likely being married than other women. If likes can be likened to money, then a small portion of men own a large portion of the online dating economy. The GINI coefficient (A measurement of inequality normally used to measure wealth inequality) places the Tinder GINI coefficient at 0.58. This means that Tinder is more unequal than 95% of countries today. <ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>

===3. Looks are not subjective. ===

Physical attractiveness is in someway innate and widely agreed upon.<ref>Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G (2007) The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures. PLoS ONE2(11): e1201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001201</ref><ref>https://archive.is/tmkKW</ref><ref>Psychological Bulletin 2000, Vol. 126, No. 3, 390-423 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390

</ref><ref>http://jonathanstray.com/papers/Langlois.pdf</ref> Infants prefer attractive faces over nonattractive ones.<ref>https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6355-babies-prefer-to-gaze-upon-beautiful-faces</ref> Young children also make value judgements based on facial features. <ref>http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/dev-dev0000734.pdf</ref>  Attractive features are widely agreed upon.<ref>https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319178660</ref>  The ratings given for an individual are never too far apart.<ref>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/langloislab/files/2015/04/meta.pdf</ref>  Even among widely different cultures, universal standards for beauty exist.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/</ref> Women overwhelmingly prefer tall men to short men.<ref>https://research.similarminds.com/romantic-height-preferences-in-men-and-women/227</ref>