Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,090: Line 1,090:
According to this data, the positive or negative impacts of one's attractiveness can be universally appreciated and resonate through an entire lifetime.
According to this data, the positive or negative impacts of one's attractiveness can be universally appreciated and resonate through an entire lifetime.


Details for the nerds: The inter-rater agreement in terms of [https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8csgjw/looks_ratings_101_nearly_all_studies_show_a/ Cronbach's α] is typically around α = .9, which is considered a high level of agreement. People agree strongly about the extremes (very attractive and unattractive), but they have diverse tastes about the mid range. For a person with average attractiveness, their ratings generally vary with about 2-3 standard deviations on a 10-point scale which is quite a lot (Wood, 2009). Hence the [[bluepill]] regarding diversity in preferences holds true for people of average attractiveness but not for ugly people, or very attractive people.
Details for the nerds: The inter-rater agreement between raters of physical attractiveness in terms of [https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8csgjw/looks_ratings_101_nearly_all_studies_show_a/ Cronbach's α] is typically around α = .9, which is considered a high level of agreement. People agree strongly about the extremes (very attractive and unattractive), but they have diverse tastes about the mid range. For a person with average attractiveness, their ratings generally vary with about 2-3 standard deviations on a 10-point scale which is quite a lot (Wood, 2009). Hence the [[bluepill]] regarding diversity in preferences holds true for people of average attractiveness but not for ugly people, or very attractive people.


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Data:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Data:'''</span>
17,538

edits

Navigation menu