Hypergamy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
224 bytes added ,  17 September 2019
Line 14: Line 14:
[[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]
[[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]


== Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy ==
== There is no simple solution except limiting women's sexual freedom ==
 
A common [[normie]] counterargument to [[:Category:Aesthetics|lookist theory]] would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as on apps and that you can display a bit of [[personality]] when approaching a woman, thus overriding hypergamy. Other studies, however, stress on the notion called the “[[halo effect]],” in which your perceived [[personality]] could be in correlation to how you look<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/92158/TheHaloEffect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>.
For example, men are commonly told to be funny to attract women. In reality, it is not the case that being funny makes you more attractive. Instead, being attractive makes you appear more funny<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny</ref> and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations<ref>https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040</ref>.
 
Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman even to desire you intimately. There has to be a physical attraction at first for a [[relationship]] to be initiated. While women say that [[personality]] matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first and foremost<ref>https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOHdZKDldIg</ref>.
 
As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free results in sexual inequality since only a few men would be desired by women. The other 80% have to [[LMS|make up heavily with status or money]].


A common [[Bluepill|bluepilled]] objection to the importance of looks and resources is that women wouldn't be as visual and shallow in real life and that one could make up for shortcomings with a good [[personality]]. Studies, however, consistently show that personality plays a small role at best, and plays no role during initial romantic contact. Acting exclusively in a friendly manner is outright harmful. The only personality dimension that does seem to play a role is dominance, wittiness, as well as showing signals of investment in a convincing manner without showing despair. What aggravates matters is that the perception of ones personality can hardly be changed as it is largely determined by ones looks.<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/92158/TheHaloEffect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref> Even perceived wittiness and morality is to large parts determined by one's looks<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny</ref><ref>https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040</ref>. These results may explain why personality could never explain romantic success: It is more about looks and status. Further, there is evidence that a man has to surpass a certain level of minimal looks for a woman even to consider traits beyond looks.
There has to be a physical attraction at first for a [[relationship]] to be initiated. While women say that [[personality]] matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first and foremost.<ref>https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOHdZKDldIg</ref> It is conceivable that since women regard the vast majority of men to be physically unattractive, women's sexual freedom will result in sexual inequality because only a few men are desired by women.


== GINI coefficients ==
== GINI coefficients ==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu