Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Scott Aaronson: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Writings on involuntary celibacy
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{quote|Still, on the merits, is there any relevant difference between the two cases beyond: “undesirability” of the disabled, fat, and trans should be critically examined and interrogated, because those people are objects of progressive sympathy; whereas “undesirability” of nerdy white and Asian males should be taken as a brute fact or even celebrated, because those people are objects of progressive contempt?|Scott Aaronson<ref>https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3766</ref>}} | {{quote|Still, on the merits, is there any relevant difference between the two cases beyond: “undesirability” of the disabled, fat, and trans should be critically examined and interrogated, because those people are objects of progressive sympathy; whereas “undesirability” of nerdy white and Asian males should be taken as a brute fact or even celebrated, because those people are objects of progressive contempt?|Scott Aaronson<ref>https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3766</ref>}} | ||
===Inceldom causing suicide=== | |||
{{quote|Here’s the central point that I think Robin failed to understand: society, today, is not on board even with the minimal claim that the suicidal suffering of men left behind by the sexual revolution really exists—or, if it does, that it matters in the slightest or deserves any sympathy or acknowledgment whatsoever.}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||