Hypergamy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:kkklll.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | [[File:kkklll.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | ||
'''Hypergamy''' is the natural inclination for women to "[[branchswinging|trade up]]" in terms of [[LMS|looks, money, and/or status]]. In a social environment which seeks to [[neoliberalism|free human sexuality from cultural influence]], women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally [[sexual selector]]s. Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, | '''Hypergamy''' is the natural inclination for women to "[[branchswinging|trade up]]" in terms of [[LMS|looks, money, and/or status]]. In a social environment which seeks to [[neoliberalism|free human sexuality from cultural influence]], women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally [[sexual selector]]s. Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, more than men, to the point of causing increasingly rampant [[inceldom]] among the male population. | ||
Modern women are always calculating whether the gains from a new [[relationship]] will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. [[Femoid|Femoids]] are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. Women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to [[Marriage#Move Toward Polyamory with Rise in Divorce|jump ship when ready]]. | Modern women are always calculating whether the gains from a new [[relationship]] will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. [[Femoid|Femoids]] are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. Women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to [[Marriage#Move Toward Polyamory with Rise in Divorce|jump ship when ready]]. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:413.jpg|thumb|left|<center>okcupid deleting their internal dating studies shortly after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack</center>]] | [[File:413.jpg|thumb|left|<center>okcupid deleting their internal dating studies shortly after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack</center>]] | ||
[[File:okcupid.png|thumb|right|<center>Women rate 80% of men as below the average of all men, source: Okcupid</center>]] | [[File:okcupid.png|thumb|right|<center>Women rate 80% of men as below the average of all men, source: Okcupid</center>]] | ||
An internal | An internal OkCupid study revealed that the vast majority of women only consider about 20% of men to be attractive in looks, and irrationally evaluate 80% of men brave enough to show their mug on a public website '''as below the average of all men'''.<ref>http://archive.is/489UV</ref> In the most popular [[dating]] app Tinder, a mating analyst found out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men".<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref> Because women are [[sexual gatekeeper]]s their preferences decide the [[dating]] scene. | ||
[[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | [[File:again.png|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | ||
OkCupid deleted its internal studies showing how women view 80% of men as below average after the [[Alek Minassian]] attack, but many archives exist including the ones cited above. | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
===Disclaimer=== | ===Disclaimer=== | ||
Some retards who read this page to write in an academic journal about the incel attitude towards hypergamy (like [[Rebecca Karlén]]) think incorrectly that incels mean that 20% of the men '''get''' 80% of the women. Firstly, with the 80/20 rule we are talking about trends in '''access''' and '''attention''' in mating instead of trying to describe 100 percent of the end '''results''' of mating. Although, we think the trends in access and attention in mating have a downstream effect on the results of mating. | Some retards who read this page to write in an academic journal about the incel attitude towards hypergamy (like [[Rebecca Karlén]]) think incorrectly that incels mean that 20% of the men '''get''' 80% of the women. Firstly, with the 80/20 rule, we are talking about trends in '''access''' and '''attention''' in mating instead of trying to describe 100 percent of the end '''results''' of mating. Although, we think the trends in access and attention in mating have a downstream effect on the results of mating. Many women and men don't end up partnering despite their dating pool. Secondly, we mean that the 80/20 rule is only strictly applicable to *online dating* apps given the evidence cited above. And the fact that [[dating#Online dating is now the primary way people meet for relationships|all dating is moving online]] means that this is becoming more true [[IRL]] as well. | ||
== Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy == | == Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy == | ||
A common [[normie]] counterargument to [[:Category:Aesthetics|lookist theory]] would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as on apps | A common [[normie]] counterargument to [[:Category:Aesthetics|lookist theory]] would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as on apps and that you can display a bit of [[personality]] when approaching a woman, thus overriding hypergamy. Other studies, however, stress on the notion called the “[[halo effect]],” in which your perceived [[personality]] could be in correlation to how you look<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/92158/TheHaloEffect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>. | ||
For example, men are commonly told to be funny to attract women. In reality, it is not the case that being funny makes you more attractive. Instead, being attractive makes you appear more funny<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny</ref> and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations<ref>https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040</ref>. | For example, men are commonly told to be funny to attract women. In reality, it is not the case that being funny makes you more attractive. Instead, being attractive makes you appear more funny<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny</ref> and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations<ref>https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040</ref>. | ||
Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman to | Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman even to desire you intimately. There has to be a physical attraction at first for a [[relationship]] to be initiated. While women say that [[personality]] matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first and foremost<ref>https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOHdZKDldIg</ref>. | ||
As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free results in sexual inequality | As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free results in sexual inequality since only a few men would be desired by women. The other 80% have to [[LMS|make up heavily with status or money]]. | ||
== GINI coefficients == | == GINI coefficients == | ||
A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human [[relationship]]s found that | A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human [[relationship]]s found that “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women”<ref>https://contexts.org/blog/who-has-how-many-sexual-partners/</ref>. Famous sexologist [[Kristin Spitznogle]] says this is proof that [[Bateman's Principle]] now applies to humans.<ref>https://resett.no/2018/06/29/menn-i-ufrivillig-solibati/</ref> A separate study of Tinder found that Tinder's GINI coefficient between the genders was on scale with the income inequality of third-world countries (see chart below).<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref> | ||
[[File:tinder.jpg|thumb|left|<center></center>]] | [[File:tinder.jpg|thumb|left|<center></center>]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Since looks are the main factor in leading to sexual attraction, we could | Since looks are the main factor in leading to sexual attraction, we could assume that females are not appreciating the facial appearances of most men and not giving their sexual favors to them frequently. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing [[long-term relationship|long-term]] , cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a [[strategic pluralism|dual-mating strategy]] in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring”<ref>http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf</ref>. The lack of loyalty with a dual-mating strategy begets the [[feminine imperative]]. | One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing [[long-term relationship|long-term]] , cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a [[strategic pluralism|dual-mating strategy]] in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring”<ref>http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf</ref>. The lack of loyalty with a dual-mating strategy begets the [[feminine imperative]]. | ||
Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) have tendencies to fuck the [[Chad]]s first, and once they become | Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) have tendencies to fuck the [[Chad]]s first, and once they become entirely used up and hit the wall, search for a [[betabux]] to attain financial security and raise children. | ||
==It's OVER if you're a male and not wealthy== | ==It's OVER if you're a male and not wealthy== | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Women are 1000 times pickier on the issue of a potential partner's wealth than men according to an academic research study by Guanlin Wang.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X</ref> | Women are 1000 times pickier on the issue of a potential partner's wealth than men according to an academic research study by Guanlin Wang.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X</ref> | ||
If you are over 25 and are poor women want you to die in a fire, source | If you are over 25 and are poor women want you to die in a fire, source OkCupid.<ref>http://archive.is/rBE2U</ref> | ||
[[File:poorcel2.png|thumb|center]] | [[File:poorcel2.png|thumb|center]] | ||
== It’s OVER if your female partner becomes more physically attractive == | == It’s OVER if your female partner becomes more physically attractive == | ||
[[File:486.png|thumb|left|<center></center>]] | [[File:486.png|thumb|left|<center></center>]] | ||
[[normie|Normalfaggots]] love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels | [[normie|Normalfaggots]] love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels since women at heart always want [[Chad]] and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance. | ||
“Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new [[relationship]]s with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners”<ref>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf</ref>. | “Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new [[relationship]]s with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners”<ref>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf</ref>. | ||
Another study showed that women orgasm more frequently when having sex with attractive guys than with non attractive guys<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002</ref>. This shows that women are very likely to keep pursuing Chads for maximum sexual pleasure. | Another study showed that women orgasm more frequently when having sex with attractive guys than with non-attractive guys<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002</ref>. This shows that women are very likely to keep pursuing Chads for maximum sexual pleasure. | ||
[[File:266.png|thumb|700x700px|right]] | [[File:266.png|thumb|700x700px|right]] | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
The researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. | The researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. | ||
Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men ( | Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (i.e., "Chads"). Thus Chads are truly having more sex than ever before. | ||
'''Direct Quotes:''' | '''Direct Quotes:''' | ||