Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,177 bytes added ,  9 July 2019
Line 36: Line 36:
===5. [[Hypergamy]]<br />===
===5. [[Hypergamy]]<br />===


Hypergamy is the natural inclination for women to "[[branchswinging|trade up]]" in terms of [[LMS|looks, money, and/or status]].  In a social environment which seeks to [[neoliberalism|free human sexuality from cultural influence]], women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally [[sexual selector]]s.  Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, moreso than men, to the point of causing increasingly rampant [[inceldom]] among the male population.
Hypergamy is the natural inclination for women to "[[branchswinging|trade up]]" in terms of [[LMS|looks, money, and/or status]].  In a social environment which seeks to [[neoliberalism|free human sexuality from cultural influence]], women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally [[sexual selector]]s.  Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, moreso than men, to the point of causing increasingly rampant [[inceldom]] among the male population. Average women receive 20 times as many matches as average men on Tinder<ref>Gareth Tyson, Vasile C. Perta, Hamed Haddadi, Michael C. Seto, Queen Mary University of London, Sapienza University of Rome, Royal Ottawa Health Care Group A First Look at User Activity on Tinder</ref>. Women rate 80% of men as "below average.<ref>https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/okcupid/yourlooksandyourinbox.html</ref> The top 10% of men get 58% of women's likes in online dating<ref>https://hingeirl.com/hinge-reports/whats-the-biggest-challenge-men-face-on-dating-apps-a-qa-with-aviv-goldgeier-junior-growth-engineer</ref><ref>ttps://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on-dating-apps/</ref>  The top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads") are now having more sex than ever before<ref>Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554</ref><ref> https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx</ref>


===Conclusion===
===Conclusion===
25,837

edits

Navigation menu