6,481
edits
Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Reasoning
m (→External link) |
m (→Reasoning) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Women's genitals are naturally stimulated by zoophilic pornography whereas men's genitals are not. This was measured and confirmed by Meredith Chivers, Ph. D., an assistant professor of psychology at Queens University in Kingston. This included all images of animal coupling they were exposed to: including e.g. Bonobos.<ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32374911/ns/health-sexual_health/t/unraveling-mystery-female-desire/#.W7vUat_nhhE</ref> | Women's genitals are naturally stimulated by zoophilic pornography whereas men's genitals are not. This was measured and confirmed by Meredith Chivers, Ph. D., an assistant professor of psychology at Queens University in Kingston. This included all images of animal coupling they were exposed to: including e.g. Bonobos.<ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32374911/ns/health-sexual_health/t/unraveling-mystery-female-desire/#.W7vUat_nhhE</ref> | ||
In 1973 a famous work was published entitled " My Secret Garden: Women’s Sexual Fantasies" that luridly detailed women's deepest sexual fantasies. The book has been dubbed the "innocent dawning of what later became known as the sex-positive feminist movement".<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/nov/06/my-secret-garden-author-nancy-friday-dies</ref> The work by the author Nancy Friday, was infamous for including several highly graphic female fantasies that pertained to the practice of bestiality, primarily with dogs. | In 1973 a famous work was published entitled "My Secret Garden: Women’s Sexual Fantasies" that luridly detailed women's deepest sexual fantasies. The book has been dubbed the "innocent dawning of what later became known as the sex-positive feminist movement".<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/nov/06/my-secret-garden-author-nancy-friday-dies</ref> The work by the author Nancy Friday, was infamous for including several highly graphic female fantasies that pertained to the practice of bestiality, primarily with dogs. | ||
In addition, Miletski (2002) reported that 87 percent of males and 100 percent of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. <ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> | In addition, Miletski (2002) reported that 87 percent of males and 100 percent of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. <ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> | ||