Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive than those with weaker bodies: Fixed grammatical error
(→All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive than those with weaker bodies: Fixed grammatical error) |
|||
| Line 868: | Line 868: | ||
* https://jeatdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40337-019-0244-4#Sec10 | * https://jeatdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40337-019-0244-4#Sec10 | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive than those with weaker bodies</span>=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) published by the Royal Society examining the preferences of 160 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive". | Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) published by the Royal Society examining the preferences of 160 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive". | ||