Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Looks, unlike features like height, are not distributed normally among the male population. One could imagine that that looks would be distributed in a naively simple way. Most are average. Some are attractive or ugly. Very few or grotesque or beautiful. The reality is that male looks are distributed close to a pareto distribution in dating environments where there is unlimited choice and little cultural influence (like dating apps). 80% of men are rated by women as below the average of all men on dating apps.<ref>http://archive.is/rSfFA</ref>  Some put this at an even more lopsided ratio of 95-5.<ref>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442</ref>  Because of this, and the fact that online dating is now the primary mode of daring in society, a large portion of men fight over a small portion of women.<ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>  The bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men. If likes can be likened to money, then a small portion of men own a large portion of the online datinf economy. The GINI coefficient (A measurement of inequality normally used to measure wealth inequality) Places the Tinder GINI coefficient at 0.58. This means that Tinder is more unequal than 95% of countries today. <ref>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a</ref>