Polyandry: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  3 May 2019
m
interlinking bot
No edit summary
m (interlinking bot)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Polyandry''' means 'multiple men per women', in a sexual context, and is generally how society orders itself in matriarchies where there is scarce farmable land, where the brothers marry the same woman together.  'Rotating polyandry', or when women have many male partners over their lifetime through divorce and promiscuity, is ultimately [[polygyny]] on a societal scale if there is a group of [[incelibate]] men in society.  [[Chads]] are [[polygyny|polygnous]], not polyandrous.  [[Femoid|Femoids]] are naturally drawn to a small % of men and are not sexually generous, encouraging societal wide [[polygyny]], not societal wide [[polyandry]].  [[Long-term relationship|long-term]] polyandry (instead of a rotating polyandry) on a societal wide scale would be beneficial to incels, because it would make men more rare in a relationship context, but it is unknown how to implement it as historical examples in industrialized societies are rare or non-existent.  <ref>https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/06/rotating-polyandry-and-its-enforcers-part-1/</ref>.
'''Polyandry''' means 'multiple men per women', in a sexual context, and is generally how society orders itself in matriarchies where there is scarce farmable land, where the brothers marry the same woman together.  'Rotating polyandry', or when women have many male partners over their lifetime through divorce and promiscuity, is ultimately [[polygyny]] on a societal scale if there is a group of [[incelibate]] men in society.  [[Chads]] are [[polygyny|polygnous]], not polyandrous.  [[Femoid|Femoids]] are naturally drawn to a small % of men and are not sexually generous, encouraging societal wide [[polygyny]], not societal wide [[polyandry]].  [[Long-term relationship|long-term]] polyandry (instead of a rotating polyandry) on a societal wide scale would be beneficial to incels, because it would make men more rare in a [[relationship]] context, but it is unknown how to implement it as historical examples in industrialized societies are rare or non-existent.  <ref>https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/06/rotating-polyandry-and-its-enforcers-part-1/</ref>.


==References==
==References==
25,837

edits

Navigation menu