Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Original Definition
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
The blackpill philosophy about society first proposed by a blog commenter named [[Paragon]] on the Dalrock anti-[[feminist]] blog in 2011 and later adopted by OmegaVirginRevolt's blog. In his comment, Paragon defines the blackpill to mean (paraphrased) ''''there's no personal solution to systemic [[dating]] problems for men and only societal hardship (such as mass poverty) can solve men's systemic [[dating]] issues''''. In other words, some blackpillers don't believe that a [[sexual Marxism|sexual marxist]], wealthy welfare state is possible. Paragon, having [[dating]] difficulties in Canada, moved from Canada to the Phillipines, a less prosperous country than Canada, and married there. '''Not all incels or incel boards promote or believe in the original blackpill definition'''. | The blackpill philosophy about society first proposed by a blog commenter named [[Paragon]] on the Dalrock anti-[[feminist]] blog in 2011 and later adopted by OmegaVirginRevolt's blog. In his comment, Paragon defines the blackpill to mean (paraphrased) ''''there's no personal solution to systemic [[dating]] problems for men and only societal hardship (such as mass poverty) can solve men's systemic [[dating]] issues''''. In other words, some blackpillers don't believe that a [[sexual Marxism|sexual marxist]], wealthy welfare state is possible. Paragon, having [[dating]] difficulties in Canada, moved from Canada to the Phillipines, a less prosperous country than Canada, and married there. '''Not all incels or incel boards promote or believe in the original blackpill definition'''. | ||
In paragons words:<ref>https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/she-felt-unloved/#comment-22914</ref> | In paragons words:<ref>https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/she-felt-unloved/#comment-22914</ref> {{Quote|to reconcile that there are no personal solutions to systemic problems – which can only resolve over evolutionary time. | ||
And any solution will very much entail steep trade-offs, in that males can’t have their cake and eat it too – a prosperous population of deferred ecological pressures(like we currently enjoy), without an expectation that this prosperity will increase the mating latitude of females(dramatically perturbing the breeding population, to the point of near evolutionary instability). | And any solution will very much entail steep trade-offs, in that males can’t have their cake and eat it too – a prosperous population of deferred ecological pressures(like we currently enjoy), without an expectation that this prosperity will increase the mating latitude of females(dramatically perturbing the breeding population, to the point of near evolutionary instability). | ||