Love shy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 bytes added ,  20 October 2018
interlinking bot
No edit summary
(interlinking bot)
Line 93: Line 93:


===Sexual orientation and gender===
===Sexual orientation and gender===
Gilmartin argued that love-shyness would have the most severe effect on heterosexual males, because of gender roles. This is because heterosexual men are almost always expected to take the more assertive role in dating situations and to be the ones to initiate intimacy with potential romantic partners, whereas heterosexual women generally take the more passive role, as assertiveness on their part is far less crucial in successfully developing a romantic relationship. He claims that it may be possible for both shy women and homosexual men to become involved in intimate relationships without needing to take any initiative, simply by waiting for a more assertive man to initiate the relationship, or in the case of lesbians, a more assertive woman. According to Gilmartin, shy women are as likely or even more likely due to their love-shyness as non-shy women to date, to marry, and to have children, while this is definitely not the case for heterosexual men. Love-shy heterosexual men normally have no informal social contact with women.  They cannot date, [[marriage|marry]] or have children, and many of these men never experience any form of intimate sexual contact. He also noted that for moral reasons, none of the love-shy men sought [[prostitute]]s. Some of the love-shys were partaking in [[mail-order bride]] agencies, but the results of these efforts were not pursued in the study.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
Gilmartin argued that love-shyness would have the most severe effect on heterosexual males, because of gender roles. This is because heterosexual men are almost always expected to take the more assertive role in [[dating]] situations and to be the ones to initiate intimacy with potential romantic partners, whereas heterosexual women generally take the more passive role, as assertiveness on their part is far less crucial in successfully developing a romantic relationship. He claims that it may be possible for both shy women and homosexual men to become involved in intimate relationships without needing to take any initiative, simply by waiting for a more assertive man to initiate the relationship, or in the case of lesbians, a more assertive woman. According to Gilmartin, shy women are as likely or even more likely due to their love-shyness as non-shy women to date, to marry, and to have children, while this is definitely not the case for heterosexual men. Love-shy heterosexual men normally have no informal social contact with women.  They cannot date, [[marriage|marry]] or have children, and many of these men never experience any form of intimate sexual contact. He also noted that for moral reasons, none of the love-shy men sought [[prostitute]]s. Some of the love-shys were partaking in [[mail-order bride]] agencies, but the results of these efforts were not pursued in the study.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>


Gilmartin noted that because of their ''perceived'' lack of interest in women, love-shy men are frequently assumed to be [[homosexual]].  Homosexual men would make advances to the love-shy men, but these advances would be rejected.  Gilmartin also noted that many love-shy men are not interested in [[friendship]]s with other men.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
Gilmartin noted that because of their ''perceived'' lack of interest in women, love-shy men are frequently assumed to be [[homosexual]].  Homosexual men would make advances to the love-shy men, but these advances would be rejected.  Gilmartin also noted that many love-shy men are not interested in [[friendship]]s with other men.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
Line 106: Line 106:


===Gilmartin's treatment concepts===
===Gilmartin's treatment concepts===
Gilmartin proposes that "practice dating" therapy would allow the love-shy men to develop crucial [[social skills]] in a non-anxiety provoking situation and to then overcome their anxieties. This approach, he claims, would successfully cure by far most of the participants from their love-shyness. He also predicts that practice dating will help eliminate male love-shys' obsession with women of high natural beauty.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
Gilmartin proposes that "practice dating" therapy would allow the love-shy men to develop crucial [[social skills]] in a non-anxiety provoking situation and to then overcome their anxieties. This approach, he claims, would successfully cure by far most of the participants from their love-shyness. He also predicts that practice [[dating]] will help eliminate male love-shys' obsession with women of high natural beauty.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>


The major therapeutic regime Gilmartin recommends after practice dating is [[Sexual surrogate|sex surrogate]] therapy. He claims, "Any truly comprehensive program calculated to guarantee a complete cure for intractable, chronic and severe love-shyness ''must'' incorporate a program facet that entails use of sexual surrogates." Sexual surrogates are therapists who will have physical intimacy up to and including sexual intercourse with their clients, and are not the same as prostitutes. A quality surrogate therapy will include an additional therapist to oversee the therapy.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
The major therapeutic regime Gilmartin recommends after practice [[dating]] is [[Sexual surrogate|sex surrogate]] therapy. He claims, "Any truly comprehensive program calculated to guarantee a complete cure for intractable, chronic and severe love-shyness ''must'' incorporate a program facet that entails use of sexual surrogates." Sexual surrogates are therapists who will have physical intimacy up to and including sexual intercourse with their clients, and are not the same as prostitutes. A quality surrogate therapy will include an additional therapist to oversee the therapy.<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>


Gilmartin argues that the norm of the male ''always'' courting the female needs to be "thrown forever into the trash can and replaced with a normative system that is compassionate and congruent with the needs and natures of human beings."<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
Gilmartin argues that the norm of the male ''always'' courting the female needs to be "thrown forever into the trash can and replaced with a normative system that is compassionate and congruent with the needs and natures of human beings."<ref name="Brian G 1989"/>
25,837

edits

Navigation menu