Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Nonredamancy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
interlinking bot
No edit summary |
(interlinking bot) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Although rejection is normal and even something which [[normies]] should anticipate, the rate at which people face nonredamancy varies widely. Whereas it is possible that top decilers such as [[Francisco Lachowski]] don't even know what nonredamancy feels like, bottom decilers such as [[Joseph Merrick]] (elephant man) will probably face a stupendous amount of nonredamancy. | Although rejection is normal and even something which [[normies]] should anticipate, the rate at which people face nonredamancy varies widely. Whereas it is possible that top decilers such as [[Francisco Lachowski]] don't even know what nonredamancy feels like, bottom decilers such as [[Joseph Merrick]] (elephant man) will probably face a stupendous amount of nonredamancy. | ||
Since [[cold approach]]es and [[warm approach]]es are primarily a male domain, women are often similar to Lachowski in that they typically are unaware of what nonredamancy feels like. This obliviousness is one of the reasons those in the [[incelosphere]] tend to be perplexed whenever they see a female journalist writing about male sexuality. In the [[cybercel]]'s mind, this makes zero sense since a female cannot possible have any inkling of what the male experience is like. One demographic that is well-acquainted with nonredamancy is those on the [[inceldom spectrum]]. What separates normies from those on the inceldom spectrum is that whereas normies may experience nonredamancy at an intermittent rate, for the latter, nonredamancy is perpetual; hence the neologism '''perpetual nonredamancy'''. | Since [[cold approach]]es and [[warm approach]]es are primarily a male domain, women are often similar to Lachowski in that they typically are unaware of what nonredamancy feels like. This obliviousness is one of the reasons those in the [[incelosphere]] tend to be perplexed whenever they see a female journalist writing about male sexuality. In the [[cybercel]]'s mind, this makes zero sense since a female cannot possible have any inkling of what the male experience is like. One demographic that is well-acquainted with nonredamancy is those on the [[inceldom spectrum]]. What separates normies from those on the [[inceldom]] spectrum is that whereas normies may experience nonredamancy at an intermittent rate, for the latter, nonredamancy is perpetual; hence the neologism '''perpetual nonredamancy'''. | ||
==Synonyms== | ==Synonyms== | ||
There are many rhematic synonyms and near-synonyms of the term nonredamancy. The following are examples that are based on a heterosexual model out of pragmatic purposes: | There are many rhematic [[synonyms]] and near-synonyms of the term nonredamancy. The following are examples that are based on a heterosexual model out of pragmatic purposes: | ||
* cockblock (female to male) | * cockblock (female to male) | ||
* friendzone (gender-neutral) | * friendzone (gender-neutral) | ||