46
edits
Pretty Boy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
theory on genetically diverse faces
(rarity) |
(theory on genetically diverse faces) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A '''Pretty Boy''' or a '''Valentino''' is a [[Face|facially]]-aesthetic, somewhat [[Femoid|feminine]], androgynous or [[neoteny|neotenous]] version of a [[man]] who is an "8" or above on the [[Decile Chart]]. Pretty Boys lack the warrior skull shape, high [[testosterone]] levels, and high human growth hormone levels required to be [[Chad]] or [[Gigachad]]. The term is a near-synonym of the word "[[Chadlite]]." However, the [[SMV]] of the Pretty Boy has a slightly higher derivation from his facial aesthetics than the typical Chadlite. Hyper feminized Pretty Boys who are [[incels]] are called [[Cutecel|cutecels]]. The Incel Wiki Team has actually also analyzed, prestigious, poor, and regular high schools, specifically their Seniors in their High School Yearbooks, and the Pretty Boy Archetype is indeed the most common form of handsome man by the widest of margins. | A '''Pretty Boy''' or a '''Valentino''' is a [[Face|facially]]-aesthetic, somewhat [[Femoid|feminine]], androgynous or [[neoteny|neotenous]] version of a [[man]] who is an "8" or above on the [[Decile Chart]]. Pretty Boys lack the warrior skull shape, high [[testosterone]] levels, and high human growth hormone levels required to be [[Chad]] or [[Gigachad]]. The term is a near-synonym of the word "[[Chadlite]]." However, the [[SMV]] of the Pretty Boy has a slightly higher derivation from his facial aesthetics than the typical Chadlite. Hyper feminized Pretty Boys who are [[incels]] are called [[Cutecel|cutecels]]. The Incel Wiki Team has actually also analyzed, prestigious, poor, and regular high schools, specifically their Seniors in their High School Yearbooks, and the Pretty Boy Archetype is indeed the most common form of handsome man by the widest of margins. | ||
Pretty Boys that are feminized more than the average pretty boy but by no means to the level of a cutecel, are the main archetype of man women seek out on social media also by the widest of margins, especially on Tiktok and Facebook, with the defining features being longer eyelashes and plumper lips. [[Chad]]s and [[Gigachad]]s, while still very attractive and desirable to women, primarily have a male fanbase online. And finally, [[Silverfox]]es are most desired by women among the older crowd online. Women primarily view extremely high [[facial masculinity]] in its isolation as being indicative the man is very physically strong and that he can satisfy their B.D.S.M fantasies and not much else positive. | Pretty Boys that are feminized more than the average pretty boy but by no means to the level of a cutecel- who is mainly just low facial masculinity (things like small chin and jaw, recessed facial bones) not necessarily high facial femininity, (full lips and lashes and pretty eyes ie. 2 different scales), are the main archetype of man women seek out on social media also by the widest of margins, especially on Tiktok and Facebook, with the defining features being longer eyelashes and plumper lips. [[Chad]]s and [[Gigachad]]s, while still very attractive and desirable to women, primarily have a male fanbase online. And finally, [[Silverfox]]es are most desired by women among the older crowd online. Women primarily view extremely high [[facial masculinity]] in its isolation as being indicative the man is very physically strong and that he can satisfy their B.D.S.M fantasies and not much else positive. | ||
Even though muscular bodies are nearly universally attractive to women,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Rated_strength_is_the_main_predictor_of_men.27s_bodily_attractiveness._No_women_prefer_weak_men</ref> | Even though muscular bodies are nearly universally attractive to women,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Rated_strength_is_the_main_predictor_of_men.27s_bodily_attractiveness._No_women_prefer_weak_men</ref> | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
The Incel Wiki Team has long suspected for years that the truly average looking man is much worse looking than rating sites would have one believe, essentially that the average man is closer to a 4/10 and lower on anonymous rating sites like Photoeval and [[Photofeeler]], which does seem to truly be the case. The official looks studies put a 6.6/10 in "attractiveness" as the bare minimum for a guy to be considered "sexy" by women, which is outlier good looks on photofeeler. Now comparing those photos of men that score around that level from [[photofeeler]] scores to high school seniors shows they are "only" the best looking guys in high school, with some schools not even having 7+/10 photofeeler looking guys. Which actually means a 6.6/10 on photofeeler in reality is around the top 1% in looks. A 7+/10 in attractiveness on [[photofeeler]] would be best looking in the city, state, country and more so 8+/10 internationally. In other words there are really three main top looks levels, high school level, Mr. X Country for example Mr. America male beauty pageant winner looking, and finally international able to win Mr. World good looking. Now those competitions select for more than just the upper echelon of looks they are still the best measuring tool since looks does come first. | The Incel Wiki Team has long suspected for years that the truly average looking man is much worse looking than rating sites would have one believe, essentially that the average man is closer to a 4/10 and lower on anonymous rating sites like Photoeval and [[Photofeeler]], which does seem to truly be the case. The official looks studies put a 6.6/10 in "attractiveness" as the bare minimum for a guy to be considered "sexy" by women, which is outlier good looks on photofeeler. Now comparing those photos of men that score around that level from [[photofeeler]] scores to high school seniors shows they are "only" the best looking guys in high school, with some schools not even having 7+/10 photofeeler looking guys. Which actually means a 6.6/10 on photofeeler in reality is around the top 1% in looks. A 7+/10 in attractiveness on [[photofeeler]] would be best looking in the city, state, country and more so 8+/10 internationally. In other words there are really three main top looks levels, high school level, Mr. X Country for example Mr. America male beauty pageant winner looking, and finally international able to win Mr. World good looking. Now those competitions select for more than just the upper echelon of looks they are still the best measuring tool since looks does come first. | ||
Clearly for straight heterosexual males to register another man as a possible threat to him in good looks, a man they feel they need to hide their girl from, the perceived threat needs to be in the top 1 %ile of good looks, where women see "attractiveness", heterosexual men see likability niceness, good morality, most importantly competence, especially hyper competence if his face is good looking and hyper masculine and his body extremely muscular. Most modern top video game characters rated whos the best, by both genders are [[Gigachad]], characters like Chris Redfield, or the entire cast of Mortal Kombat etc. It is likely genetically diverse for their race, muscular men are seen as so attractive and or competent by men and women at every task is a bias that stems from our hunter gatherer ancestry. It's likely that its just fisherian runaway being applied to the fantastical, fantasy aspects of the modern world, in essence evolutionary mismatch. For example, being a special forces operative hunting international bad guys all over the world would require all the necessary traits to hunt down a simple animal but heightened to the extreme, and we expect our ideal "hunter" operative to look like Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Pat Tilman, Mark Vanderloo etc. | Clearly for straight heterosexual males to register another man as a possible threat to him in good looks, a man they feel they need to hide their girl from, the perceived threat needs to be in the top 1 %ile of good looks, where women see "attractiveness", heterosexual men see likability niceness, good morality, most importantly competence, especially hyper competence if his face is good looking and hyper masculine and his body extremely muscular. Most modern top video game characters rated whos the best, by both genders are [[Gigachad]], characters like Chris Redfield, or the entire cast of Mortal Kombat etc. It is likely genetically diverse for their race, muscular men are seen as so attractive and or competent by men and women at every task is a bias that stems from our hunter gatherer ancestry. It's likely that its just fisherian runaway being applied to the fantastical, fantasy aspects of the modern world, in essence evolutionary mismatch across multiple cognitive domains, especially since the best pure athletes all over the world are very obviously full race not super mixed race populations, blacks in running speed whites in strength/powerlifting etc. For example, being a special forces operative hunting international bad guys all over the world would require all the necessary traits to hunt down a simple animal but heightened to the extreme, and we expect our ideal "hunter" operative to look like Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Pat Tilman, Mark Vanderloo etc. Its likely following [[female logic]] that the attraction women have to genetically diverse male faces has an element of pure cosmetics to it-as in its attractive because its "pretty" and "koinophilic"- a weak heuristic for quality without much information known before hand, and not super advantageous not necessarily the handicap principle but close enough. Since its largely form over function weather its from mental or physical health, in practice on photoeval most of the top guys are professional male models, even the sole jacked black guy on the leaderboard was a male model not a working athlete, the top guy chico lachowski is the prime example, he works out and boxes but doesnt actually compete, male models are similar to action figures or dolls that are never taken out of the box and when they are they dont usually perform stellar in athletics its likely ancient hunting on their ancestral lands would have been no different. | ||
===Behavioral androgyny, 'homosexual genes', and sexual success=== | ===Behavioral androgyny, 'homosexual genes', and sexual success=== | ||