6,353
edits
Demographics of inceldom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
(Add Sparks et al. (2023)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
* Incels were more anxious (''d'' = 0.59). | * Incels were more anxious (''d'' = 0.59). | ||
* Incels had lower self-esteem than control men (''d'' = -1.09). | * Incels had lower self-esteem than control men (''d'' = -1.09). | ||
* Incels were likelier to report an avoidant attachment style (''d'' = 0.74) and also more likely to report an anxious attachment style (''d'' = 0.45, 95% CI 0.14-0.76), which indicate lower views of attachment objects (such as family members and potential romantic partners) in the case of the former and negative views of themselves as an attachment object in the case of the latter (likely related to a greater fear of rejection, if the effect is robust.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223185973_Development_and_validation_of_a_State_Adult_Attachment_Measure_SAAM</ref> Incels were less likely to report a secure attachment style (''d'' = -1.98). | * Incels were likelier to report an avoidant attachment style (''d'' = 0.74) and also more likely to report an anxious attachment style (''d'' = 0.45, 95% CI 0.14-0.76), which indicate lower views of attachment objects (such as family members and potential romantic partners) in the case of the former and negative views of themselves as an attachment object in the case of the latter (likely related to a greater fear of rejection, if the effect is robust).<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223185973_Development_and_validation_of_a_State_Adult_Attachment_Measure_SAAM</ref> Incels were less likely to report a secure attachment style (''d'' = -1.98). | ||
* '''Dating attitudes''' | * '''Dating attitudes''' | ||
* Incels' self-perceived mate value was much lower than non-incels' (''d'' = -2.19). | * Incels' self-perceived mate value was much lower than non-incels' (''d'' = -2.19). | ||